Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained

On Jun 9, 1:44 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
cjcountess wrote:

Hi everyone, this is Conrad Countess

I think that all of you have some good ideas

A hallmark of social advocacy: "every voice is of equal weight - and
so mine."  Bull***.  One need only look at abutting Catholic vs.
Protestant neighborhoods to see whose voice carries more weight.  Cram
a bunch of Jews together and obtain the Manhattan Project.  Do it with
Blacks and get urban Washington, DC.


o.m.f'ing.G Al please do not say stupid *** such as this I know that
you are better than that, and if you are'nt then you should wash your
mouth with soap.


[ snip ]

You sure as Hell can simply by tidal forces. Three orthogonal
circles
of marbles in free fall will not only detect orbital vs. inertial
free
fall, they will supply all the elements necessary to calculate your
orbit (or show there is none). "LOCALITY" You miss the point
entirely. You could not miss it more if you were competent and
tried.

[ end snip ]


So, you think that tidal forces invalidate EP ? I dont think so. If
you put the Earth inside a big black box, you would have NO WAY to
empirically determine whether tides were due to lunar influence, or if
the whole Earth were experiencing an acceleration. Dont serve me that
dish, I send it back to the fucking kitchen and the waiter will get NO
TIP.

Your example fails, please try again. I dont judge _anyone_ , I take
em' as they come and if you keep posting counterexamples like that I
will have to redden your buttocks with merciless whippings of science
and logic.

And, stop talking like Potter. Just shut it.



.

Quantcast