Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 20, 4:28 pm, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Dougie, the dunce, has never made a '+ new post' on the groups. Apart
from his bluster (foul smelling wind), he has never addressed a single
issue about science. — NE —
NoEinstein wrote:
On Jun 10, 11:11 am, cjcountess <cjcount...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear cjcountess: E = mc^2 violates the law of the Conservation of
Energy.
Wrong.
The only "variable" in SR is the 'v' in the Lorentz
transformation divisor. Einstein claimed: "There isn't enough energy
in the entire Universe to cause even a speck of matter to travel to
velocity 'c'." Einstein got that erroneous notion because 'g' had
wrongly been written as 32.174 feet per second SQUARED.
Wrong. History is not john's strength.
Also, because
Coriolis's KE = 1/2 mv^2 is an exponential rate of increase.
Wrong. Math is not john's strength.
The
CORRECT way to write 'g' is: 32.174 feet per second EACH second. And
the correct way to write the kinetic energy of a moving object is: KE
= a/g (m) + v/32.174 (m).
Wrong. Science is not john's strength.
Both of those increase LINEARLY with
respect to time and velocity.
Wrong. Logic is not john's strength.
MORON Einstein mistook simple
acceleration to be: Acceleration of the acceleration.
Wrong. John demonstrates again his lack of math knowledge.
The latter, and
only the latter, would require more energy than in the Universe to
reach velocity 'c'. I have disproved both SR and GR.
Wrong. John likes to lie about this.
Read any of the
attached links to understand why. — NoEinstein —
All of the above show john's mistakes. Read them for a good
laugh or to pity john for his willing ignorance.
Where Angels Fear to Fall
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e...
Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre...
Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316...
An Einstein Disproof for Dummies
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63...
Another look at Einstein
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721...
Three Problems for Math and Science
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f...
Matter from Thin Air
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe...
Curing Einstein’s Disease
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e...
Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526...
Cleaning Away Einstein’s Mishmash
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847...
Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1...
Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8...
Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe...
The Gravity of Masses Doesn’t Bend Light.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99...
KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85...
Light rays don’t travel on ballistic curves.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a...
A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a1702...
Hi this is Conrad Countess
Uncle Al,
you seem to be an old bitter prejudice fool. I gather that you are
Jewish, from your name and what others have said of you. I try not to
be prejudice but I am African American, and I must defend myself from
the prejudice remark that you just made concerning Blacks and Jews.
I know that my discovery of the geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2,
is better than anything you will ever produce, and you can’t stand it..
I am an individual African American, and your an individual Jew, and I
beat you.
I would never go as far as saying that all of us are better than all
of you because I know that it is not true. But I will go as far to say
that my discovery is better that yours
E=mc^2 is the most famous equation in the world , created by the most
famous scientist “Albert Einstein”, the man that you want to emulate,
whom some affectionately called “Uncle Al”, And I, an African
American, have taken his discovery further, while you couldn’t.
WELL WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT?
Conrad Countess- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: doug
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- References:
- The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: johnlawrencereedjr
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: Heliyummm
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: cjcountess
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: Heliyummm
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: cjcountess
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- From: doug
- The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- Prev by Date: Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
- Next by Date: Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- Previous by thread: Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- Next by thread: Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading