Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained

Restating The Equivalence Principle

Inertia mass = Gravitational Mass = Accelerated motion

If an object moves in a straight line, at constant speed, relative to
an observer at rest, it is said not to be accelerating. Acceleration
is defined as any deviation from this constant speed in straight line,
such as slowing down, speeding up, or turning. But if the observer
attempts to stop the object, which is a form of acceleration, “slowing
it down”, it will have inertia of resisting this stoppage which
depends on the speed and mass of object. “F=mv”. The force that it
takes to stop this object is equal to and opposite the force it took
to set it in motion, including the lifting of object from gravitation
pull of planet.

Photons also have this kind of inertia, as exhibited in the photo
electric effect, of knocking electrons out of mettle. This inertia is
the result of kinetic energy of motion, and the higher the frequency
the higher this kinetic energy. In other words higher frequency
translates to higher speed of cycles per time unite, measured as E=hf/
c^2. Also sense the photons become more particle like as frequency
increases, this led me to logically assume that as frequency increases
at E =hf/c^2 evidentially and eventialy a photon will reach E=hf=c^2
or as deBroglie stated, “E=hf=mc^2”, and that a photon will become a
rest mass particle.
It is only logical, mathematical, and geometrical, that analogous to a
line of one inch in linear direction, times a line of one inch in 90
degree angular direction, making a square inch, c in the linear
direction, times c in the 90 degree angular direction, will create a
90 degree arc trajectory which if constant creates a circle in 2d, and
a sphere in 3d, for a balance of centripetal and centrifugal forces.
And so from here we can see that gravitational rest mass of quantum
particles begin at c^2 as energy in circular and or spherical motion,
which is also inertia in rotation and acceleration.
Gravitational rest mass of particle = Inertial in rotation =
Acceleration as circular motion, and
I think I can safely state that G as gravity constant of rest mass =
c^2 = h/2pi and c = h for gravity constant of radiation.

Conrad Countess

P.S.
Uncle Al remember this from our first encounter

“Tell us how affine/teleparallel gravitation makes exactly the same
predictions - qualitative and quantitative to the lst decimal place
 -
as metric gravitation but without spacetime curvature.  You can't
have
it both ways, buddy boy.  Either the equations are parity-even
scalars
and tensors with spacetime curvature or parity-odd pseudoscalars and
pseudotensors with spacetime torsion.
Go ahead, tell us how a curvature looks like a Lorentz force.”
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c3d2094579aeee47?hl=en

Well from this evidence, Lorentz contraction of EM waves, turns into
space – time curvature of EM waves, as E=hf/c^2 turns into E=hf =mc^2,
and a wave turns into a rest mass particle.

Also remember this from your buddy Bjoern Feuerbacher

“It is *also* not very civil to assert right from the start that you
are brilliant enough to have found a solution to a problem on which
thousands of *educated*, *brilliant* people have worked for decades
now, although you don't even have knowledge of the most basic
physics.”

from:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/fab4f87af50161e8?hl=en


Well I did it, I found the solution.


What ever happened to him? I hope he's OK and I would not want to say
anything bad about someone if something did happen to him. But if not,
Id like to get him back in the ring. I am the Muhammad Ali of
physics.. Just Joking, but I really do get a kick out of you guys.
Just keep it coming cause I get stronger and stronger. But that is
only because the theory is correct and you are fighting a losing
battle.


The people have a right to know that the long awaited quantum gravity
problem has been solved.

Conrad countess



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Could Machs Principle be a real force?
    ... inertia recuperated the 18/02/2009) ... M a distant mass ... due to acceleration and is  what is responsible for inertia. ... and opposite  force due to all the forces in the whole universe. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... Thus, inertia is not a property of mass an sich, but an external ... I would express it somewhat different: "Inertia" means that a test ... You don't feel gravitation as long as you move along a geodesic. ... But the clock runs SLOWEST there! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... or slower when it is separated from another clock. ... problems dealing with gravitation. ... Of course GR accounts for inertia! ... You agreed with Mach's principle, you agreed with mass creating inertia, you agreed with more mass creating more inertia, the latter mass NOT being the test mass, but the mass "over there", around the test mass. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE GRAVITATION MASS.
    ... THE INERTIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL MASS ... "According to Newton's law of motion, ... If now gravitation is the cause of the acceleration, ... general law of the inertia, because by making the we obtain the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Could Machs Principle be a real force?
    ... inertia recuperated the 18/02/2009) ... M a distant mass ... due to acceleration and is what is responsible for inertia. ... and opposite force due to all the forces in the whole universe. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)