Re: ?Google rules, who's poured more money into useNet ?

Tom Potter wrote:

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TrT5m.779111$yE1.115849@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Potter wrote:

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2Um5m.776943$yE1.197184@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Potter wrote:

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PfJ4m.177324$DP1.138912@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Potter wrote:


When DejaNews provided Usenet searches, one could quickly find any
post,
or set of posts, and DejaNews did not censor messages and posters,
and unlike Google, DejaNews presented the posts actually searched for
without massaging, censoring, and shuffling.

You're just Pissed Potter--You Abused Google Groups and
got ousted... if you had behaved in a rational responsible manner...

I am surprised to see that my pal Sammy
does not see the danger in having a small group of people
control:
1. The information repository.
2. Who can access the information.
3. What information is presented to a researcher.
4. Who can input data into the repository.

A small group of people control almost every organization,
Potter! Some are elected and can be ousted by the people.
Some can be bought down by people not buying the products
and services.

I don't see any group having a monopoly on information.
The internet is actually contributing to democratization
and the free flow of information... changing how news
propagates and is participated in.

You think like an old controlling codger full of hatred
and vindictiveness. Go smell some flowers, Potter.

My pal Sammy makes a good point.

Yer dern toot'n Potter!

Sammy, I suspect that you don't have children,
but do the members of your quartet and your girl friend
know about your "posting record"

and how you try to mislead new readers of a thread
by editing posts?


I share storied about you with my wife and friend often, Potter!
Very often!

.

Relevant Pages