Re: Help with paper.
- From: Peter <Poakfield@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 24, 12:53 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter wrote:
On Aug 24, 12:34 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter wrote:
Hi! I wrote a paper about an unexpected finding I made in physics thatZero point fluctuations.
started with the simple concept that all activity requires energy.
I[snip rest]
submitted this paper to a journal, but it was rejected, not because it
was considered to be wrong, but because, they said, it required
extensive revision and editing.
It was wrong.
--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
You are wrong. Sorry.
PO
Actually, Uncle Al, made valid points. It is the mark of a true crank
to assume you can't be wrong. Al just pointed you a contradiction to
your thesis. Fix it!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
How can you assert something on a paper you haven't read?
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with paper.
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Help with paper.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Help with paper.
- From: Benj
- Re: Help with paper.
- References:
- Help with paper.
- From: Peter
- Re: Help with paper.
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Help with paper.
- From: Peter
- Re: Help with paper.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Help with paper.
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with paper.
- Next by Date: Re: Approximating gravity waves?
- Previous by thread: Re: Help with paper.
- Next by thread: Re: Help with paper.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|