Re: Help with paper.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

PD wrote:

Two comments.
- It's important to show calculations, not a simulation. This is what
makes the work reproducible by an independent investigator -- an
essential ingredient to the methodology.

The simulator is subjective to gravitational pulls using Newtonian
arithmetics for each second. It uses a fudge factor that is the same as
the one used for GPS time dilation calculations.
[snip rest of crap]

You discredited yourself, again. The first GPS satellite was not
default corrected for General Relativity (GR), but it did have an
ancillary offset oscillator. When run default status the GPS fix
drifted 10 km/day for its atomic clocks desynching with ground
stations. When GR correction was added it was accurate to its clocks'
tested ground accuracy.

Since the GR "fudge factor" is altitude above geoid dependent, that
must be some batch of fudge,

<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/gpsrec.html>
The Devil
<http://www.leapsecond.com/history/Ashby-Relativity.htm>
The details

idiot

Uncle Al maintains that left and right shoes - chemically and
macroscopically identical, enantiomorphic atomic mass distributions -
need not validate the Equilivalence Principle (EP). As Special
Relativity becomes General Relativity through postulating the EP, GR
would be wrong. However...

1) GR (1916) would only fail for left and right shoes
(enantiomorphs). No prior observation in any venue at any scale would
be contradicted. Adults call this "consistency."

2) Theory already exists allowing EP violation in just this way -
teleparallel gravitation theory by Einstein, Cartan, and Weitzenböck
(1931). If EP = true without exception, teleparallel theory collapses
to GR. Adults call this "consistency."

3) Uncle Al offers two kinds of benchtop tests in existing
equipment, to observe empirical reality and objectively decide,

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Doable as an undergrad project

4) Two scholarly papers in a refereed journal - one on application
of quantitative parity divergence, the other on EP parity violation
testing - have been accepted for publication first quarter 2010.
Referees could find no defensible arguments against my experiments'
validity as calculated, or their pertinence as novel observation, or
their credibility for succeeding. The universe is equally well built
either way.

Physics is absolutely livid with rage. Chemistry doesn't care about
gravitation. The mathematics journal thought the papers were
absolutely spiffy - for these guys can do the math while ignoring the
dogma and politics of application.

Pookie pookie

"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how
smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong."
Richard Feynman. Somebody should look.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT] Hints for an algorithm - avoiding O(n^2)
    ... The obvious way is to compute the force interactions ... > results will not be similar in time (I'm planning to manage about ... You are going to make a simulation, ... to do the calculations between objects much less frequently, ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: Top ten trolls.
    ... > Hi, Uncle Al, ... "uncle al" "parity eotvos" 287 hits ... calculations at all to justify the experiment... ... the project mostly isn't physics. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Bismuth radioactive??
    ... > Dear Uncle Al, ... >> unsuspected ones that can sneak under modern calculations. ... > One might expect that the resulting fluxes of neutrinos and ... may not violate prior observations with your new predictions. ...
    (sci.chem)
  • Re: Help with paper.
    ... - It's important to show calculations, not a simulation. ... It uses a fudge factor that is the same as the one used for GPS time dilation calculations. ... The end result is very close to what is being observed, just by considering gravitational pulls. ... your model must make certain predictions that are different than ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Help with paper.
    ... - It's important to show calculations, not a simulation. ... It uses a fudge factor that is the same as the one used for GPS time dilation calculations. ... The end result is very close to what is being observed, just by considering gravitational pulls. ... your model must make certain predictions that are different than ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast