Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 7, 6:27 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JSH wrote:
[...]
I am the published author here, though I also add the editors pulled
after publication.
The "published author" sticker loses its' shine when your only publication
was retracted, with the entire journal ceasing publication a short time
later.
[...]
Unless you know that the result is a revolutionary one that upsets
enough apple-carts that destruction of one electronic journal is minor
in comparison to the hugeness of the upset.
The preponderance of the evidence here is just extraordinary. There
is not just the bizarrely dead journal.
Readers who wish to see how big what I call the Math Wars are need
only do a few quick Google searches.
Has to be Google search on: define mathematical proof
Or in Google: binary quadratic Diophantine equations
To get a link to the dead math journal's archives on EMIS and also see
a link to the edition where my paper was yanked, just Google: SWJPAM
And I've posted yet again a re-discovery of mine of a rational conic
parameterization that has been known for centuries:
Given x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, in rationals:
y = 2t/(D - t^2) and x = (D + t^2)/(D - t^2)
Google is an emergent technology (as well as a company of course) and
what you can possibly see now is what wasn't visible before when major
upheavals could lurk for some time before a revolution in thinking,
so, for instance, Galileo was some time after Copernicus and
persecuted, imprisoned in his own home for YEARS.
It was 40 years if I remember correctly after his landmark book that
Darwin's theories on evolution started to really gain traction.
This saga instead of playing out over decades is playing out over
years, and is becoming visible because of the LATEST technology of the
modern age.
Ranting posters decrying Google and claiming its search results are
meaningless are a far cry from torch bearing clergy burning the devil
out of "heretics" but they represent the same type of resistive force.
New technology here reveals what has never before been seen in human
civilization--the below the surface movement of new ideas against
heated opposition.
James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: bob
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: Mark Murray
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: eric gisse
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- References:
- JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: Mark Murray
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: doug
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- From: eric gisse
- JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- Prev by Date: Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Would a major result get picked up?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|