Re: JSH: So why lie about P vs NP?

On Oct 24, 10:00 pm, "cheesron" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"JSH" <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:643c737a-33b6-4201-affa-c44bdca6544c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 23, 9:32 pm, "cheesron" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"JSH" <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:06967e79-069f-4612-b63d-469ab971462c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

One of the continuing taunts I see in replies from Usenet posters is
for me to factor a large number or to factor an RSA number as I have
basic research (for instance, I invented a factoring technique called
surrogate factoring) that opens the door *potentially* to rapid
factoring of large numbers though I don't claim to have a full
application for doing so, which I liken to having the physics theory
indicating atomic weapons are possible without necessarily having an
actual atomic bomb.

factor 1111
that is real easy, I bet I can do it faster with a pencil.

I factored much bigger numbers than that!  Didn't matter.

no, you have not. indicate source URL NOW.

Sigh. I'll do a rare posting of a link to my math blog since I don't
see a Google search that pulls up the page:

http://mymath.blogspot.com/2007/02/surrogate-factoring-examples.html

That was early research mainly to just get some notion that the path
taken was working, but I still had multiple problems to solve before I
reached the integer factorization algorithm, which does pull up with a
Google search, but only at #10, when I do a search just now on:
integer factorization algorithm

The evidence is there. And I've posted it before on sci.math and the
sci.crypt newsgroup and I assure you, no matter what I factored they
did not care. The rationalizations would fly, insults would just keep
coming and I'd just see posts claiming that it DID NOT MATTER.

Just like when I got published in a math journal the math people said
publication DID NOT MATTER. (And later they killed the math
journal!!! Google: SWJPAM)

They are just blocking. Their one real rule is that no matter what
evidence or proof I give, they'll just insult me and claim it's not
important.


James Harris
.

Relevant Pages

  • JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary
    ... Basically no matter what I discover, ... Now, supposedly, surrogate factoring is just some random, or, ... The reality is that I show extraordinary mathematics, and posters work ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary
    ... Basically no matter what I discover, ... Now, supposedly, surrogate factoring is just some random, or, ... The reality is that I show extraordinary mathematics, and posters work ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: Really weird story, not your faults
    ... Doesn't matter. ... factor before the research matures, or it finds out the hard way AFTER ... That conclusion then requires factoring an RSA number and maybe even ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary
    ... > Basically no matter what I discover, ... If they do use Surrogate Factoring, ... I will apologize then. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary
    ... > Basically no matter what I discover, ... If they do use Surrogate Factoring, ... I will apologize then. ...
    (sci.crypt)