sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• What if(on a machine life Saver), G=EMC^2 Glazier
• where's d old man?, Raymond Yohros
• Gravity bends light, right?, RayLopez99
  • Re: Gravity bends light, right?, Androcles
  • Re: Gravity bends light, right?, Uncle Al
• Transmutation of elements: what is the most stable element--it's Pb (lead) right?, RayLopez99
  • Re: Transmutation of elements: what is the most stable element--it's Pb (lead) right?, Greg Neill
    • Re: Transmutation of elements: what is the most stable element--it's Pb (lead) right?, RayLopez99
  • Re: Transmutation of elements: what is the most stable element--it's Pb (lead) right?, Uncle Al
• Re: Contact CERN and demand to stop the global suicide., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Contact CERN and demand to stop the global suicide., Sam Wormley
• Re: co2 snow falls at -110 F and sinks, tj Frazir
• Re: The list of AGW acts of Frauds and crimes against science so f..., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The list of AGW acts of Frauds and crimes against science so f..., tj Frazir
• Global Cooling-Wanna Bet?, Sam Wormley
• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DEL MONTE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, Bruce Boykin
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, 11/29/2009, thejohnlreed
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, 11/29/2009, Uncle Al
• I choose three (#5), 3 Physics Blogs
  • Re: I choose three (#5), Raymond Yohros
• Re: OT The Sex Industry: A Multicultural Problem, Uncle Al
• Re: The great climate change science scandal (Times UK), Uncle Al
• Re: Climate Data, tj Frazir
  • Re: Climate Data, Aleph
• Re: Global Warming for profit, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 346.2: Gauge/Symmetry Groups and +/- i, +/-1, 0, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 346.2: Gauge/Symmetry Groups and +/- i, +/-1, 0, OsherD
• JSH: Optimal path and physical reality, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Optimal path and physical reality, JSH
    • Re: JSH: Optimal path and physical reality, Mark Murray
  • Re: JSH: Optimal path and physical reality, Uncle Al
    • Re: JSH: Optimal path and physical reality, Mark Murray
  • Re: Optimal path and physical reality, sanboz
• Re: Why Pendulum as a clock do not shows, what General Theory of Re..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Causality", Muidem
  • Re: "Causality", Uncle Al
• Re: Alex Jones on Climate Gate, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Alex Jones on Climate Gate, tj Frazir
    • Re: Alex Jones on Climate Gate, Aleph
• Re: Scientist in climate COOLING 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
  • Re: Scientist in climate COOLING 'cover-up' storm told to quit, Aleph
• Re: A suggestion for the LHC project, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A suggestion for the LHC project, Aleph
• Quantum Gravity 346.1: More Regarding Standard Model and GUT Gauge Groups, OsherD
• Re: Britain's Drowned World - a Time Team special on climate change, tj Frazir
  • Re: Britain's Drowned World - a Time Team special on climate change, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Britain's Drowned World - a Time Team special on climate change, tj Frazir
    • Re: Britain's Drowned World - a Time Team special on climate change, Aleph
• Re: 423 MPG at 71 HP is HOW to fix, tj Frazir
  • Re: 423 MPG at 71 HP is HOW to fix, Aleph
• Re: The list of AGW acts of Frauds and crimes against science so ..., tj Frazir
  • Re: The list of AGW acts of Frauds and crimes against science so ..., Aleph
• Re: Climate Data lies posted by liers, tj Frazir
• Series RLC circuit tutorial, brent
• Re: Repubs = Psychopaths, spiritual energy
  • Re: Repubs = Psychopaths, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Repubs = Psychopaths, Robert Higgins
• Re: Space or Mass, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Space or Mass, Uncle Al
• Dr. Arthur Becker-Weidman (air pressure game), Anonymous
• Collision Question, afng
  • Re: Collision Question, Peter Webb
  • Re: Collision Question, Greg Neill
  • Re: Collision Question, Androcles
• Re: Superconductor magnet spacecraft heat shield being developed, tj Frazir
• Re: Sci.Physics' Sam Wormley in Ames Iowa, tj Frazir
  • Re: Sci.Physics' Sam Wormley in Ames Iowa, Aleph
• Quantum Gravity 346.0: So What Do Gauge Algebras/Groups SU(3), SU(2), U(1), U(3), SU(5), SU(6), SO(10) Actually Tell us About Interactions?, OsherD
• The Most High, Automutt
• Henrik Svensmark, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Henrik Svensmark, Marvin the Martian
    • Re: Henrik Svensmark, Sam Wormley
      • Re: HenrikIowa's got allot of morons, tj Frazir
      • Re: HenrikIowa's got allot of morons, Aleph
      • Re: Henrik Svensmark, Robert Higgins
  • Re: Henrik Svensmark the crackhead, tj Frazir
    • Re: Henrik Svensmark the crackhead, Aleph
• Where does the subtantial mass of the universe reside?, 7
  • Re: Where does the subtantial mass of the universe reside?, OG
    • Re: Where does the subtantial mass of the universe reside?, 7
    • Re: Where does the subtantial mass of the universe reside?, Androcles
• Re: Scientists agree on this, Dork Spotter
• Re: (u_all) Chemical Concept Of Life - 'The Big Bang In Your Primordial* Soup' - {HRI note 20091115-I-V3.2.1-u_all}, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (u_all) Chemical Concept Of Life - 'The Big Bang In Your Primordial* Soup' - {HRI note 20091115-I-V3.2.1-u_all}, Rick N. Backer
• Re: Chemical Concept Of Life - 'The Big Bang In Your Primordial* Soup' - {HRI note 20091115-I-V3.2.1}, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Chemical Concept Of Life - 'The Big Bang In Your Primordial* Soup' - {HRI note 20091115-I-V3.2.1}, Rick N. Backer
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality", Muidem
  • Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality", Uncle Al
• Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, RayLopez99
  • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, tadchem
    • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, RayLopez99
      • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, Darwin123
      • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, tadchem
  • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, Darwin123
  • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, Darwin123
    • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, RayLopez99
      • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, Darwin123
  • Re: Radioactive photoluminescent material...what is it and how does it work?, Sam Wormley
• Re: Star Trek and black holes, Sam Wormley
• ECCOMAS CFD 2010 Mini-Symposium on Image Processing and Visualization, tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Steve Rado, Actual Phyics by - Re: KP2009SEP13 THE SIMPLE REVOLUTION IN PHYSICS = UNDERSTANDING!, Leonardo Been
• Quantum Gravity 345.9: Sound Waves as in Sonoluminescence Give Clues To Expansion-Contraction, Repulsion-Attraction, OsherD
• Re:  Re: Can't you ( TJ ) send 5 bucks anonymously ?, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Re: Can't you ( TJ ) send 5 bucks anonymously ?, tj Frazir
• Re: Interesting experiment on "Mythbusters", tj Frazir
• For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, Sam Wormley
  • Re: For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, john
    • Re: For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, Sam Wormley
      • Re: For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, Sam Wormley
      • Re: For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, Sam Wormley
      • Re: For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, john
      • Re: For John: Milky Way Grew by Swallowing Other Galaxies, Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Nov 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHATâ??S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Nov 09 Washington..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "traveling light" is pure mirage in the part of SPATIAL speed of light, Uncle Al
• the Bohr Atom and the Fine Structure Constant (alpha), alyosha zolotov in WV
  • Re: the Bohr Atom and the Fine Structure Constant (alpha), Uncle Al
• "A Basic Look at the Aether", Muidem
  • Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether", Uncle Al
• Re: Sa-Rah! Sa-RAH! How Dubya Gave Dummies a Bad Name., tj Frazir
• Re: UFO hovering over Oklahoma skies baffles astronomy club, tj Frazir
• Re:  Can't you ( TJ ) send 5 bucks anonymously ?, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Can't you ( TJ ) send 5 bucks anonymously ?, tj Frazir
  • Re:  Can't you ( TJ ) send 5 bucks anonymously ?, tj Frazir
• Re: climate change ' is hotair, tj Frazir
• Re: The list of AGW acts of Frauds and crimes against science so fa..., tj Frazir
• Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re:  Electrons are â??accelerated photonsâ??; the NET CHARGE sta..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• JSH: Right answer on research funding?, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Right answer on research funding?, Uncle Al
• Re: The Twin Paradox Embodied on a Hard Drive? The hard thinks it has met it's twin but is taking in information from the Internet to see it's reflection, Uncle Al
• Re: What goes up must come down, Uncle Al
  • Re: What goes up must come down, Y.Porat
    • Re: What goes up must come down, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What goes up must come down, tj Frazir
    • Re: What goes up must come down, Aleph
  • Re: What goes up must come down, tj Frazir
  • Re: What goes up must come down, Aleph
• Re:  Often, gravity is stronger because there's so much more of it., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Often, gravity is stronger because there's so much more of it., Aleph
    • Re: Often, gravity is stronger because there's so much more of it., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Often, gravity is stronger because there's so much more of it., Aleph
• Re: Compelling new data that chemical and fossil evidence of ancien..., tj Frazir
  • Re: Compelling new data that chemical and fossil evidence of ancien..., Aleph
• Why is dawn cold?, Hamid V. Ansari
  • Re: Why is dawn cold?, eratosthenes
  • Re: Why is dawn cold?, Cwatters
    • Re: Why is dawn cold?, Hamid V. Ansari
      • Re: Why is dawn cold?, Hamid V. Ansari
      • Re: Why is dawn cold?, Androcles
  • Re: Why is dawn cold?blue nipel ?, tj Frazir
    • Re: Why is dawn cold?blue nipel ?, Cwatters
      • Re: Why is dawn cold?blue nipel ?, tj Frazir
• Re:  How rich are you, TJ ?, tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Re: ? Can't you ( TJ ) send 5 bucks anonymously ?, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  How rich are you, TJ ?, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 345.8: y = +/- f(x) vs y = f(+/- x) Repulsion vs Attraction, OsherD
• Did Scientists Create Artificial Life?, Dr. Sushen Krishna das
• CLIMATE CHANGE EMAILS STOP GLACIERS FROM MELTING, Cwatters
  • Re: CLIMATE CHANGE EMAILS STOP GLACIERS FROM MELTING, Yousuf Khan
    • Re: CLIMATE CHANGE EMAILS STOP GLACIERS FROM MELTING, Cwatters
      • Re: CLIMATE CHANGE EMAILS STOP GLACIERS FROM MELTING, Aleph
• Quantum Gravity 345.7: France Relates Determinants and "Anti-Determinants" (Permanents) to Fermions and Bosons, Attraction and Repulsion, OsherD
• tapping into the Mantle for unlimited energy & Denmark's excess electricity #23 Earth's energy future, Archimedes Plutonium
• Quantum Gravity 345.6: Quantum Gravity From P(A ' ) = 1 - P(A), OsherD
• nanophotonic devices could revolutionize the telecommunications industry, spiritual energy
  • Re: nanophotonic devices could revolutionize the telecommunications industry, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Transparency proof and absorption in glass, tj Frazir
• JSH: My sphere packing idea, JSH
  • Re: JSH: My sphere packing idea, Uncle Al
  • Re: My sphere packing idea, sanboz
  • Re: JSH: My sphere packing idea, Mark Murray
• Quantum Gravity 345.5: Bounded vs Unbounded Complements, Right vs Left Directed Complements, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 345.5: Bounded vs Unbounded Complements, Right vs Left Directed Complements, OsherD
• Re: Nasa's James Hansen warns, tj Frazir
  • Re: Nasa's James Hansen warns, Marvin the Martian
    • Re: Nasa's James Hansen warns, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Nasa's James Hansen warns, tj Frazir
      • Re: Nasa's James Hansen warns, Aleph
• What if(on virtual Friends), G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
  • Re: The best GPS System, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
    • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
    • Message not available
      • Re: ? How rich are you, TJ ?, Aleph
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
  • Re: The best GPS System, tj Frazir
• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PANDORAS BOX ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, Calvin Gay
• Re: When mass deficit is equal to zero ..., Uncle Al
  • Message not available
    • Re: When mass deficit is equal to zero ..., Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: When mass deficit is equal to zero ..., nuny@xxxxxxx
• Happy Thanksgiving to all the Chickens, Geese and Turkeys, Huang
  • Re: Happy Thanksgiving to all the Chickens, Geese and Turkeys, Uncle Al
    • Re: Happy Thanksgiving to all the Chickens, Geese and Turkeys, Huang
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving to all the Chickens, Geese and Turkeys, Huang
• Re:  I'm not a member of your religion, Captain., tj Frazir
  • Re:  I'm not a member of your religion, Captain., Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  I'm not a member of your religion, Captain., tj Frazir
• Re:  Captain, you only have 560 pixels ( width ), right ?, tj Frazir
  • Re: Captain, you only have 560 pixels ( width ), right ?, Aleph
• Quantum Gravity 345.4: The Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Basis of Newton's 3rd Law and Conservation of Momentum, OsherD
• Test, Marvin Barley
• Some more ‘ true’ Physical fables and fantasies., socratus
  • Re: Some more ? true? Physical fables and fantasies., Uncle Al
  • Re: Some more ‘ true’ Physical fables and fantasies., Raymond Yohros
• Economical Tickets - Student Flight Deals to Chennai India, New York Sify Tripz Travels
• einstein summation, Harvey
  • Re: einstein summation, eric gisse
• Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
    • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, Aleph
  • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
  • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
  • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
  • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
    • Message not available
      • Re: ? Sci.Physics' Sam Wormley in Ames Iowa, Aleph
    • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, Aleph
  • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
    • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, Aleph
  • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
    • Re: Scientist in climate change 'cover-up' storm told to quit, Aleph
• Re: Scientist 1500 NASA-GATE 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
  • Re: Scientist 1500 NASA-GATE 'cover-up' storm told to quit, Aleph
• Re: Scientist in climate Gate 'cover-up' storm told to quit, tj Frazir
  • Re: Scientist in climate Gate 'cover-up' storm told to quit, Aleph
• From James Hansen, Sam Wormley
  • Re: From James Hansen, JohnF
    • Re: From James Hansen, tadchem
    • Re: From James Hansen lies about pic dates, tj Frazir
• Exploding Galaxies, 7
  • Re: Exploding Galaxies, Darwin123
    • Re: Exploding Galaxies, 7
      • Re: Exploding Galaxies, Darwin123
  • Re: Exploding Galaxies, Yousuf Khan
    • Re: Exploding Galaxies, Darwin123
  • Re: Exploding Galaxies, Uncle Al
• "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe", Muidem
  • Re: "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe", hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re:  TJ makes everyone laugh at me ( Jeff Relf ), even my family..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re:  TJ makes everyone laugh at me ( Jeff Relf ), even my famil..., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  TJ makes everyone laugh at me ( Jeff Relf ), even my family..., tj Frazir
  • Re:  TJ makes everyone laugh at me ( Jeff Relf ), even my family..., tj Frazir
• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BOSSES DAY ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, Jessica CODY
• Re: Science & Religion!, Miguel Alberto
• Something physical, Huang
• Quantum Gravity 345.3: Resolution of the Quandary By An Arbitrary Probability = 1 or = k(t) constant at time t assignment, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 345.3: Resolution of the Quandary By An Arbitrary Probability = 1 or = k(t) constant at time t assignment, OsherD
• What if(on Holding Their Shape), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), Darwin123
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), Darwin123
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Holding Their Shape), Darwin123
• What ever happened to Google's Project 10^100?, Tom Potter
  • Re: What ever happened to Google's Project 10^100?, greysky
• Re: Though Experiment - Density and Bouyancy, Androcles
• Science or Religion ?, socratus
  • Re: Science or Religion ?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Science or Religion ?, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Science or Religion ?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Science or Religion ?, George Hammond
• More on the global warming fraud., Marvin the Martian
  • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Sam Wormley
    • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Benj
  • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Surfer
  • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Sam Wormley
    • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Benj
      • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Marvin the Martian
      • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Sam Wormley
      • Re: More on the global warming fraud., tj Frazir
      • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Benj
      • Re: More on the global warming fraud., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Sam Wormley
    • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Marvin the Martian
      • Re: More on the global warming fraud., Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci-Gate Just like you, tj Frazir
  • Re: Sci-Gate Just like you, Aleph
• God, no one
  • Re: God, Uncle Al
    • Re: God, Benj
    • Re: God, Darwin123
  • Re: God, 7
  • Re: God, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: God, Raymond Yohros
• A.G. Cuomo : States raiding pensions , broadband nowhere and the usual rascals everywhere, financialtools1
  • A.G. Cuomo and financialtools1 will hand themselves in to the Department of Homoland Security, 7
• Re:  What if ( on Bert, born in Boston at the start of 19'28 ), G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Thought Experiment - Buoyancy and Density, Positron
  • Re: Thought Experiment - Buoyancy and Density, Uncle Al
    • Re: Thought Experiment - Buoyancy and Density, Positron
      • Re: Thought Experiment - Buoyancy and Density, jbriggs444
      • Re: Thought Experiment - Buoyancy and Density, Positron
      • Re: Thought Experiment - Buoyancy and Density, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ JEEP ACCESSORIES ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, Ginger York
• Re:  Captain: how come no one, not even me, is allowed a test-dr..., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Captain: how come no one, not even me, is allowed a test-dr..., Jarek Duda
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Captain: how come no one, not even me, is allowed a test-dr..., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Captain: how come no one, not even me, is allowed a test-dr..., tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 345.2: P{(A ' --> B ' )(B ' --> C ' )(C ' --> D ' )}, OsherD
• First programmable quantum computer created, Sam Wormley
• Re:  Re: tj frazir's steam engine competition, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 345.1: New Interpretation of P(A1<-->A2<-->...<-->An) = P(A1A2...An) + P(A1 ' A2 ' ... An ' ), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 345.1: New Interpretation of P(A1<-->A2<-->...<-->An) = P(A1A2...An) + P(A1 ' A2 ' ... An ' ), OsherD
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, modified 11/23/09, johnreed, thejohnlreed
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, modified 11/23/09, johnreed, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, modified 11/23/09, johnreed, Uncle Al
• Re: FR Bending of Light, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FR Bending of Light, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: FR Bending of Light, Sam Wormley
    • Re: FR Bending of Light, tj Frazir
• Re: Very cheap solar power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Very cheap solar power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Very cheep Sci fiz gate, tj Frazir
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, tj Frazir
      • Re: 175 MPG water rockets Herb, tj Frazir
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, tj Frazir
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, tj Frazir
      • Re: wedge engine and reedblock, tj Frazir
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re: dont undestand water rockets sam, tj Frazir
      • Re: dont undestand water rockets sam, Aleph
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Sam Wormley
      • Re:WATER ROCKETS WORK STUPID, tj Frazir
      • Re:WATER ROCKETS WORK STUPID, Aleph
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, tj Frazir
      • Re: Very cheap solar power, Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: ? TJ makes everyone laugh at me ( Jeff Relf ), even my family and friends., Aleph
• What if (on Old People), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on Old People), Sam Wormley
    • Re: What if (on Old People), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on Old People), Uncle Al
    • Re: What if (on Old People), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on Old People), Ray Vickson
  • Re: What if (on Old People), HardySpicer
  • Re: What if (on Old People), tj Frazir
    • Re: What if (on Old People), Aleph
• Re:  Re: I recommend you sign·up with Glorb, the NNTP server., tj Frazir
  • Re: Re: I recommend you sign up with Glorb, the NNTP server., Aleph
• Re:  I recommend you sign·up with Glorb, the NNTP server., tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Re: Captain, you only have 560 pixels ( width ), right ?, Aleph
• LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., PD
  • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., Greg Neill
      • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., john
      • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., Sam Wormley
      • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., Raymond Yohros
      • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., PD
  • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., Aleph
  • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., PD
    • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., BradGuth
      • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., PD
  • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., BradGuth
    • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., Autymn D. C.
  • Re: LHC restarts and you're still here to read about it., HardySpicer
• Coriolis and work, Peter
  • Re: Coriolis and work, jbriggs444
    • Re: Coriolis and work, Peter
      • Re: Coriolis and work, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Coriolis and work, Bill Barber
    • Re: Coriolis and work, Peter
      • Re: Coriolis and work, PD
      • Re: Coriolis and work, Peter
      • Re: Coriolis and work, PD
      • Re: Coriolis and work, Peter
      • Re: Coriolis and work, PD
      • Re: Coriolis and work, Peter
      • Re: Coriolis and work, PD
      • Re: Coriolis and work, Peter
      • Re: Coriolis and work, PD
      • Re: Coriolis and work, PD
      • Re: Coriolis and work, Peter
• A couple of clicks to affluence!, KillSwisk
  • Re: A couple of clicks to affluence!, Uncle Al
• Kinetic energy, Peter
  • Re: Kinetic energy, PD
    • Re: Kinetic energy, Mahipal7638
    • Re: Kinetic energy, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy, PD
  • Re: Kinetic energy, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Kinetic energy, Dirk Van de moortel
• WCCM / APCOM2010 Mini-Symposium on Computational Methods in Image Processing and Analysis, tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
  • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
    • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Owen Jacobson
  • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Owen Jacobson
    • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the..., Sam Wormley
  • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Owen Jacobson
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Owen Jacobson
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Owen Jacobson
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Owen Jacobson
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Owen Jacobson
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
  • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
    • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Autymn D. C.
    • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, PD
  • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
    • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, jbriggs444
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Androcles
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, jbriggs444
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, Cwatters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Unbalanced (action/reaction) elastic vs inelastic collisions the secret behind inertial propulsion, JT
• Quantum Gravity 345.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Brings Force/Interaction Back into Theoretical Physics, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 345.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Brings Force/Interaction Back into Theoretical Physics, OsherD
• Suicide Prevention Poem..., Automutt
  • Re: Suicide Prevention Poem..., tadchem
• Re:  Lay off the drugs, guys, you're acting like meth addicts., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Lay off the drugs, guys, you're acting like meth addicts., tj Frazir
    • Re:  Lay off the drugs, guys, you're acting like meth addicts., Aleph
• New funny math cartoons http://notsohumblepi.com/mathtoons, Craig Snodgrass
• Re: Space and Time, tj Frazir
  • Re: Space and Time, Aleph
• Re: Flow science, tj Frazir
  • Re: Flow science, Raymond Yohros
    • Re: Flow science, Raymond Yohros
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Flow science, tj Frazir
    • Re: Flow science, Raymond Yohros
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, modified, johnreed, thejohnlreed
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, modified, johnreed, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, modified, johnreed, thejohnlreed
• big bangs sound, Raymond Yohros
  • Re: big bangs sound, Sam Wormley
  • Re: big bangs sound, Uncle Al
  • Re: big bangs sound, Marvin the Martian
    • Re: big bangs sound, Raymond Yohros
    • Re: big bangs sound, Raymond Yohros
  • Re: big bangs sound, Cwatters
    • Re: big bangs sound, Raymond Yohros
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Tecuaf
  • Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Kook spotter
  • Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Uncle Al
• Bad science at Hadley CRU revealed by hacker(s), tadchem
  • Re: Bad science at Hadley CRU revealed by hacker(s), tadchem
    • Re: Bad science at Hadley CRU revealed by hacker(s), Cwatters
• Quantum Gravity 344.91: P{(A ' --> B)(B-->C)}, P{(A ' --> B ' )(B ' --> C ' )}, P{A ' --> B)(B --> C ' )}, OsherD
• Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Ian Macmillan
  • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Androcles
  • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Helmut Wabnig
      • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Uncle Al
      • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, rabid_fan
      • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, rabid_fan
    • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Raymond Yohros
  • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, Uncle Al
  • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, rabid_fan
  • Re: Feynman's Sprinkler et al, jbriggs444
• Quantum Gravity 344.9: P{(A ' --> B)(B-->C)} or same with B ' or C ', OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 344.9: P{(A ' --> B)(B-->C)} or same with B ' or C ', OsherD
• tj frazir's steam engine competition, Tom Potter
  • Re: tj frazir's steam engine competition, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: tj frazir's steam engine competition, tj Frazir
    • Re: tj frazir's steam engine competition, tj Frazir
    • Re: tj frazir's steam engine competition, tj Frazir
      • Re: tj frazir's steam engine competition, Aleph
  • Re: tj frazir's steam engine competition, tj Frazir
• Maximum possible sound frequency?, mike3
  • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Yousuf Khan
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, tj Frazir
  • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Androcles
  • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, nuny@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, rabid_fan
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Bill Barber
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, cjcountess
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Aleph
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Aleph
  • Re: Maximum possible sound frequency?, Uncle Al
• Re: scientists cant make a space elevator, tj Frazir
  • Re: scientists cant make a space elevator, Aleph
    • Re: scientists cant make a space elevator, tj Frazir
      • Re: scientists cant make a space elevator, Aleph
• Against the Winged One..., Automutt
• Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
  • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, 7
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, rabid_fan
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Bernd Felsche
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Benj
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, BDR-529
      • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Marvin the Martian
  • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, tj Frazir
  • Re: Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud, tj Frazir
• How to define annihiliation?, 7
• Re: ? Avril Lavigne was easier on the eyes., Aleph
• Re: ELECTRIC UNIVERSE THEORY extension is needed., Uncle Al
• "The Arrow of Time", Tecuaf
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", Kook spotter
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", Uncle Al
• Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, 7
  • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, Yousuf Khan
      • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, Yousuf Khan
      • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Neutron Decay ON/OFF Switch, 7
• Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, Ross
  • Re: Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, Robert Higgins
  • Re: Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, Uncle Al
    • Re: Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, Robert Higgins
  • Re: Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, rabid_fan
    • Re: Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, rabid_fan
      • Re: Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, rabid_fan
    • Re: Current models of electron orbitals / bonding, Y.Porat
• Spin of Quantum Particle and Gravity Mass. (? !), socratus
  • Re: Spin of Quantum Particle and Gravity Mass. (? !), socratus
• Quantum Gravity 344.8: P(A ' --> B ' ), P(A ' --> B), P(A --> B ' ) in Terms of P(A-->B), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 344.8: P(A ' --> B ' ), P(A ' --> B), P(A --> B ' ) in Terms of P(A-->B), OsherD
• In pictures: Cern Large Hadron Collider restarts, Sam Wormley
  • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Sam Wormley
    • Message not available
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Aleph
    • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Sam Wormley
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Sam Wormley
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Raymond Yohros
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Raymond Yohros
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Raymond Yohros
      • Re: In pictures: CERN Large Hadron Collider restarts, Raymond Yohros
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, johnreed, thejohnlreed
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, johnreed, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, johnreed, thejohnlreed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 4a, johnreed, thejohnlreed
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Nov 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• And the Most High has looked upon his times,, Automutt
• Do you believe in Physics ?, socratus
  • Re: Do you believe in Physics ?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Do you believe in Physics ?, Benj
      • Re: Do you believe in Physics ?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Do you believe in Physics ?, Robert Higgins
• Re: Narrow Band Reflector for Lasers, Uncle Al
• QUARKS INFLUENCED BY THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD, Sam Wormley
  • Re: QUARKS INFLUENCED BY THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD, Yousuf Khan
• Re:  Declare UTF·8 ( not US·ASCII ) standard and be done with it., Aleph
• "The Einstein Hoax", Tecuaf
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Uncle Al
    • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", BradGuth
      • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Uncle Al
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", BradGuth
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Kook spotter
• Idea that may kill string theory?, andyeverett
  • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, francoisbelfort
    • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, andyeverett
    • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, nuny@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, francoisbelfort
      • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, Raymond Yohros
      • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, tj Frazir
    • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Idea that may kill string theory?, Raymond Yohros
• Re: can you imagine the out cum if you just let the TAO be one KAN obe, Aleph
  • Re: can you imagine the out cum if you just let the TAO be one KAN obe, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
    • Re: can you imagine the out cum if you just let the TAO be one KAN obe, Aleph
• Sound Lens, I.N. Galidakis
  • Re: Sound Lens, tadchem
    • Re: Sound Lens, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 344.7: P(Repulsion) = 1 - P(Separation Causation), OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 344.6: P ' (A-->B) - P(A-->B) = Separate Probable Causation/Influence = "SPI", OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 344.6: P ' (A-->B) - P(A-->B) = Separate Probable Causation/Influence = "SPI", OsherD
• Work and kinetic enrgy, Peter
  • Re: Work and kinetic enrgy, Androcles
    • Re: Work and kinetic enrgy, BURT
  • Re: Work and kinetic enrgy, Uncle Al
    • Re: Work and kinetic enrgy, Peter
      • Re: Work and kinetic enrgy, Androcles
• Re: Light and heat order in the aether, Inertial
  • Re: Light and heat order in the aether, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Light and heat order in the aether, BURT
    • Re: Light and heat order in the aether, Aleph
• Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Bill Snyder
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, BURT
    • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Inertial
    • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Gerard Westendorp
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, iman way
    • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, PD
    • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, BURT
    • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
  • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, PD
    • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
      • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, tj Frazir
      • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
      • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, tj Frazir
      • Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons, Aleph
• Ghosts, infants on Zimbabwe's voter's roll, as
• Germany protests attack of priest by soldiers, as
  • Re: Germany protests attack of priest by soldiers, Marvin the Martian
    • Re: Germany protests attack of priest by soldiers, nuny@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Germany protests attack of priest by soldiers, Marvin the Martian
      • Re: Germany protests attack of priest by soldiers, nuny@xxxxxxx
• New Water Shortages in Zimbabwean Capital Prompt Cholera Outbreak Fears, as
• Global Fund Extends Life of Zimbabwe Funding for AIDS, Other Diseases, as
• hugonews, Hugonews
  • Re: hugonews, john
• Students arrested over 'gun', as
• Muchadehama removed from remand, as
• Zimbabwe to host SADC parliamentary session, as
• Critics: U.N. food summit wasteful, ineffective, as
• Civil service audit to begin November, but will exclude army, as
• Police admit falsifying evidence, as
• Makoni Labels Zanu PF "Murderers And Thieves", as
• Inyathi residents rally behind invaded farm owner, as
• Hardly any work done as Zimbabwe deadline looms, as
• Zimbabwe parliament passes bill to reform Reserve Bank, as
• Chinamasa seeks better pay for judges, as
• Zimbabwe To Flush Out Ghost Workers, as
  • Re: Zimbabwe To Flush Out Ghost Workers, Uncle Al
• Re: Relfcluesslessness Increase, eric gisse
  • Re: Relfcluesslessness Increase, Aleph
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Tecuaf
  • Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Uncle Al
• Re: The Aether Part 2, Uncle Al
  • Re: The Aether Part 2, Raymond Yohros
• Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, notacop
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, notacop
  • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, tj Frazir
    • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, Aleph
  • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, Marvin the Martian
  • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, tj Frazir
  • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, Marvin the Martian
  • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, Marvin the Martian
    • Re: Can scientists make a space elevator?, Raymond Yohros
• Quantum dots used to recover electricity from waste heat of laptops & cell phones @ 90% efficiency, Yousuf Khan
• Quantum Gravity 344.5: Lancaster U. in U.K. Explore Riccati-Like Painleve VI Equations, OsherD
• A theory of everything coming on tiny steps, Frank
  • Re: A theory of everything coming on tiny steps, Uncle Al
    • Re: A theory of everything coming on tiny steps, Frank
      • Re: A theory of everything coming on tiny steps, francoisbelfort
• Revving up particles in the cosmos, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Revving up particles in the cosmos, john
• Quantum Gravity 344.4: P(AB ' ) as a Measure of P(A) - P(B) under certain Conditions, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 344.4: P(AB ' ) as a Measure of P(A) - P(B) under certain Conditions, OsherD
• Most recent exchange between Uncle Al and johnreed, thejohnlreed
  • Re: Most recent exchange between Uncle Al and johnreed, Uncle Al
    • Re: Most recent exchange between Uncle Al and johnreed, BradGuth
    • Re: Most recent exchange between Uncle Al and johnreed, thejohnlreed
• Quantum Gravity 344.3: When B is a subset of A (with probability 1) then Choose C = B to Make P ' (A-->B) = P(C-->B), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 344.3: When B is a subset of A (with probability 1) then Choose C = B to Make P ' (A-->B) = P(C-->B), Huang
• Re: Michael Moroney is stuck in 1995., Aleph
  • Re: Michael Moroney is stuck in 1995., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Worst science newspaper article ever?, Raphanus
  • Re: Worst science newspaper article ever?, sanboz
• Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, eric gisse
  • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, john
    • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, eric gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, tj Frazir
      • Re: Motion of non-confidence in our medical system, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
  • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, eric gisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, eric gisse
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Robert Higgins
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jeffs Cluelessness increases, eric gisse
      • Re: Jeffs Cluelessness increases, Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Aleph
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, eric gisse
  • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Igor
    • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, BURT
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, BURT
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Message not available
      • Re: The resulting electron·positron pair is just “accelerated photons”., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: ? Electrons are "accelerated photons", Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: Relf Stalks and Phails, Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: ? Re: Aleph contracts for netDirekt.DE, Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: c·URL isn't recursive, “ wget -recurs ” is., Robert Higgins
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: ? Lay off the drugs, guys, you're acting like meth addicts., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lay off the drugs, guys, you're acting like meth addicts., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: ? Electrons are "accelerated photons", Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: ? Electrons are "accelerated photons", Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I recommend you sign·up with Glorb, the NNTP server., eric gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Eric Gisse has copied my many aspects of my posting style., Aleph
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Igor
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Igor
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Darwin123
      • Message not available
      • Re: Colliding photon ( gamma ray ) jets., Darwin123
      • Re: Colliding photon ( gamma ray ) jets., Jarek Duda
      • Re: Colliding photon ( gamma ray ) jets., Darwin123
      • Message not available
      • Re: Colliding photon ( gamma ray ) jets., Darwin123
      • Message not available
      • Re: Colliding photon ( gamma ray ) jets., Darwin123
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Igor
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Igor
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Darwin123
      • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Igor
  • Re: Why against Stern-Gerlach experiment photons are said to be spin 1?, Darwin123
• Re:  TJ's Sliding-Vane Hydro-Rotor., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  TJ's Sliding-Vane Hydro-Rotor., tj Frazir
  • Re:  TJ's Sliding-Vane Hydro-Rotor., tj Frazir
  • Re:  TJ's Sliding-Vane Hydro-Rotor., tj Frazir
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Tecuaf
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Uncle Al
    • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Sebastian Garth
• Re: 6-foot Sea-level Rise Not Inevitable, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Mendeley, Andrew
• Nuclear arsenal enough to turn Earth into Venus???, mike3
  • Re: Nuclear arsenal enough to turn Earth into Venus???, Peter Webb
  • Re: Nuclear arsenal enough to turn Earth into Venus???, BDR-529
• Quantum Gravity 344.2: Steven Weinberg Checks in on Horava Superluminality, OsherD
• Finance, draidgeds
  • Re: Finance, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • finance, avaxiavet
• Science and Metaphysic., socratus
  • Re: Science and Metaphysic., Y.Porat
    • Re: Science and Metaphysic., socratus
      • Re: Science and Metaphysic., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Science and Metaphysic., socratus
      • Re: Science and Metaphysic., socratus
      • Re: Science and Metaphysic., Androcles
      • Re: Science and Metaphysic., socratus
  • Re: Science and Metaphysic., Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 344.1: Construction of Set C Such that P(CB ' ) = P(A) - P(B), OsherD
• *** The Trinity Explained, Automutt
• The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background 2.72548 +/- 0.00057 K, Sam Wormley
• Why?, tadchem
  • Re: Why?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Why?, Y.Porat
  • Re: Why?, Cwatters
  • Re: Why?, jmfbahciv
• Re: Moroney, the world has moved on, leaving you ( and your RFCs ) behind., Aleph
• Re:  Hydra Motor Train Engines, tj Frazir
• Re:  Water Turbine Train Engines, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Water Turbine Train Engines, tj Frazir
  • Re:  Water Turbine Train Engines, tj Frazir
  • Re:  Water Turbine Train Engines, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re:  Water Turbine Train Engines, BradGuth
      • Re:  Water Turbine Train Engines, tj Frazir
• New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Cwatters
  • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Androcles
  • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Sam Wormley
    • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, BradGuth
  • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Uncle Al
  • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, eric gisse
    • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, tadchem
      • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, eric gisse
    • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Cwatters
  • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, BDR-529
    • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Androcles
      • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, BDR-529
      • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, BradGuth
      • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Androcles
      • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, BDR-529
      • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Androcles
    • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, BradGuth
      • Hackers show Global warming "scientist" to be damned Frauds., Marvin the Martian
    • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, tj Frazir
  • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Marvin the Martian
    • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, Cwatters
      • Re: New thermometer says global temperatures down, tj Frazir
  • Re: New study says global temperatures will rise 6C, tj Frazir
• Re: Improvements in Open Access, iman way
• Quantum Gravity 344.0: National Security Agency (USA) Explores Exp(-kt) vs Exp(+kt) Bounds, OsherD
• Recent exchanges Sam Wormly, Uncle Al and johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: Recent exchanges Sam Wormly, Uncle Al and johnreed, Uncle Al
    • Re: Recent exchanges Sam Wormly, Uncle Al and johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
      • Re: Recent exchanges Sam Wormly, Uncle Al and johnreed, Uncle Al
      • Re: Recent exchanges Sam Wormly, Uncle Al and johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Go Green Earth Energy, Uncle Al
  • Re: Go Green Earth Energy, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: About reason why there are only four essential different quark species, Uncle Al
• Re: The Aether, Uncle Al
• Quantum Adventure, Físico Teórico
• Health, Diltoppoleked
  • Re: Health, Uncle Al
  • Re: Health, Jay S Hell
• Energy - physicsup.com, physicsup.com
  • Re: Energy - physicsup.com, Uncle Al
    • Re: Energy - physicsup.com, johnlawrencereedjr
• My sinus thing is gone- thanks H1N1, john
• The Fossil Truth, Jong Kim
  • Re: The Fossil Truth, Uncle Al
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Tecuaf
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Uncle Al
• Re: Firefox warns about Google, Aleph
• Re: The Aether clock, tj Frazir
• Re: Do we need dark matter?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Do we need dark matter?, BradGuth
    • Re: Do we need dark matter?, Yousuf Khan
      • Message not available
      • Re: ? Often, gravity is stronger because there's so much more of it., Aleph
      • Re: Do we need dark matter?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Do we need dark matter?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Do we need dark matter?, Yousuf Khan
      • Re: Do we need dark matter?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Do we need dark matter?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Do we need dark matter?, eric gisse
• Re: Intersection of Cone with Plane, Boris Mohar
• Sacrosanct Modern Physics, maxwell
  • Re: Sacrosanct Modern Physics, Androcles
  • Re: Sacrosanct Modern Physics, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Sacrosanct Modern Physics, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 343.9: Coulomb/Inverse r^2 Interactions and Expansion/Contraction, OsherD
• Sun's Energy, granite stone
  • Re: Sun's Energy, granite stone
  • Re: Sun's Energy, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Sun's Energy, granite stone
      • Re: Sun's Energy, granite stone
      • Re: Sun's Energy, Uncle Al
      • Re: Sun's Energy, granite stone
      • Re: Sun's Energy, Greg Neill
  • Re: Sun's Energy, Uncle Al
• Article: Dark Matter Exists, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Article: Dark Matter Exists, john
    • Re: Article: Dark Matter Exists, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Article: Dark Matter Exists, eric gisse
      • Re: Article: Dark Matter Exists, john
      • Re: Article: Dark Matter Exists, eric gisse
• Re:  Where did wii gets sigless ?, tj Frazir
• Re:  Who is TJ Frazir ?, tj Frazir
  • Re: Who is TJ Frazir?, Aleph
• Quantum Gravity 343.8: C Such That P(CB ' ) = P(A) - P(B) is the "Real Conjugate" of the Symmetric Difference, OsherD
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Nredom
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Uncle Al
• In SUSY we trust: What the LHC is really looking for, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: In SUSY we trust: What the LHC is really looking for, Raymond Yohros
• Re:  Who died and made Windows-1252 king ?, tj Frazir
  • Re:  Who died and made Windows-1252 king?, Aleph
    • Re:  Who died and made Windows-1252 king?, nuny@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Who died and made Windows-1252 king ?, tj Frazir
• MULTICONF-10 Call for papers, James Heralds
• Re:  TJ, I need a ( Fed Ex ) tracking number, a tracking number., tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Re: TJ in Vancouver B.C., Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  TJ, I need a ( Fed Ex ) tracking number, a tracking number., tj Frazir
    • Re:  TJ, I need a ( Fed Ex ) tracking number, a tracking number., Aleph
    • Message not available
      • Re: I hate the uncertainty ( was it lost in the mail ? )., Aleph
• Quantum Gravity 343.7: A Set C Such That P(C) = P(A) - P(B) Even if A = A(t) = A_t and B = B(t) = B_t are "time-varying sets", OsherD
• APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Sam Wormley
  • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Robert Higgins
    • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Surfer
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Robert Higgins
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Surfer
    • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Cwatters
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Robert Higgins
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Cwatters
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Robert Higgins
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Cwatters
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Robert Higgins
      • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Androcles
  • Re: APS rejects plea to alter stance on climate change, Marvin the Martian
• Re: FR Per. Prec. + Light Bending, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: FR Per. Prec. + Light Bending, Sam Wormley
    • Re: FR Per. Prec. + Light Bending, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: FR Per. Prec. + Light Bending, Sam Wormley
• The Great Attractor Nonsense, 7
• Re: An old Chinese saying, Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 343.6: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Optimality Relates to Unification/Quantum Gravity in 4-Interaction Axes Picture, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 343.6: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Optimality Relates to Unification/Quantum Gravity in 4-Interaction Axes Picture, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 343.5: Multiple Interaction Literature (Continued), OsherD
• Warming of the atmosphere - physicsup.com, physicsup.com
  • Re: Warming of the atmosphere - physicsup.com, 7
• JSH: Some history is the future, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Some history is the future, 7
  • Re: JSH: Some history is the future, Uncle Al
  • Re: JSH: Some history is the future, Amy
  • Re: JSH: Some history is the future, Noob
  • Re: JSH: Some history is the future, JSH
    • Re: JSH: Some history is the future, Mark Murray
• A Physics "Paradox": Holes That Block Light, Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 343.4: Gravitomagnetism, GravitoWeak Interaction, GravitoStrong Interaction, and Repulsive Combinations, OsherD
• Re: Time, Sam Wormley
• Re: Neutrino speed and fastest matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Outlook Express 7, ThunderBird·3, BDR-529
  • Re: Outlook Express 7, ThunderBird·3, Aleph
  • Message not available
    • Re: NNTP server “ www.Glorb.COM/usenet.php ” is 10 dollars per YEAR !, Aleph
• Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, Uncle Al
  • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, nuny@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, Uncle Al
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, nuny@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, nuny@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, nuny@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, jmfbahciv
    • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, jmfbahciv
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, Uncle Al
  • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, tj Frazir
    • Re: Sonic welder / Road Side Bombs, tj Frazir
      • Re: Sonic welder / Road Side Bombs, Aleph
    • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, Aleph
  • Re: Taggent Material To Indicate Roadbed Digging / Road Side Bombs, tj Frazir
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Nredom
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Uncle Al
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", tadchem
• HPCS-10 Call for papers, James Heralds
• Re: I've been trying ( 4 times now ) to get Google·Groups to accept..., Aleph
• Re: A single <img> tag, nothing more, is “valid HTML”., Aleph
• What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Sam Wormley
    • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: ultra·sensitive blue eyes., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: ultra·sensitive blue eyes., tadchem
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
      • Re: What if(on Star core Horizon), Aleph
• Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics, sorin
  • Re: Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics, Uncle Al
  • Re: Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics, 7
    • Re: Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics, Huang
      • Re: Stern Gerlach experiment and absurdities of modern physics, Robert Higgins
• Attach physicsup.com, physicsup.com
• Quantum Gravity 343.3: MIT and National Security Agency USA Explore Sums and Differences and Their Set Relationships, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 343.3: MIT and National Security Agency USA Explore Sums and Differences and Their Set Relationships, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 343.2: What Happened To Time and Magnetism in The "Perception-Interaction" Picture?, OsherD
• Re: The crime of electronic journals, spiritual energy
• CLIMATE CHANGE: APS TELLS DENIERS TO COOL OFF, Sam Wormley
  • Re: CLIMATE CHANGE: APS TELLS DENIERS TO COOL OFF, BDR-529
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Nov 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Nov 09 Washington, DC, Uncle Al
• Re: Understanding Gravity, Uncle Al
  • Re: Understanding Gravity, BURT
  • Re: Understanding Gravity, Raymond Yohros
• NASA finds 24 gallons of water on moon after impact of LCros, how much did you calculate Uncle Al for the rocket fuel?, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: NASA finds 24 gallons of water on moon after impact of LCros, how much did you calculate Uncle Al for the rocket fuel?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: NASA finds 24 gallons of water on moon after impact of LCros,how much did you calculate Uncle Al for the rocket fuel?, Uncle Al
  • Re: NASA finds 24 gallons of water on moon after impact of LCros, how much did you calculate Uncle Al for the rocket fuel?, Uncle Al
    • Re: NASA finds 24 gallons of water on moon after impact of LCros, how much did you calculate Uncle Al for the rocket fuel?, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: NASA finds 24 gallons of water on moon after impact of LCros, how much did you calculate Uncle Al for the rocket fuel?, sanboz
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 13 November 2009 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Nredom
  • Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Uncle Al
• The physics of the flu, john
  • Re: The physics of the flu, eric gisse
  • Re: The physics of the flu, Uncle Al
  • Re: The physics of the flu, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: The physics of the flu, BURT
• Re:  Michael Moroney, shake off those RFC·blues., tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Re: TJ, I need a ( Fed Ex ) tracking number, a tracking number., JT
      • Message not available
      • Re:  Topics drift., Aleph
      • Re: TJ, I need a ( Fed Ex ) tracking number, a tracking number., Sam Wormley
• Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Cwatters
  • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Androcles
    • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., BDR-529
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Androcles
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Cwatters
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Matthew Lybanon
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Androcles
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Cwatters
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Androcles
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Cwatters
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Androcles
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., BDR-529
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Androcles
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., mrbawana2u
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., mrbawana2u
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., mrbawana2u
  • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Uncle Al
  • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Robert Higgins
    • Re: Greenland's ice sheet is melting faster than everr..., Surfer
• Quantum Gravity 343.1: The Strong Interaction as Sound via Strings/Branes and an Explanation of Asymptotic Freedom and Quark Confinement, OsherD
• Re: Launch of canonical science reports, jmfbahciv
• Quantum Gravity 343.0: Quantum Gravity/Unification From a Frenet-Serret System in Asymmetric Biology, OsherD
• Record chills are falling, but only in number, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Record chills are falling, but only in number, tadchem
• CHEMICAL CONCEPT OF LIFE AND IT’S LIMITATION, Dr. Sushen Krishna das
  • Re: CHEMICAL CONCEPT OF LIFE AND IT'S LIMITATION, Jay S Hell
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: (rev 2.0) Chemical Concept Of Life - 'The Big Bang In Your Primordial Soup' - {HRI note 20091115-I-V2.0}, Saul Levy
  • Message not available
    • Re: Chemical Concept Of Life - 'The Big Bang In Your Primordial Soup' - {HRI note 20091115-I}, Saul Levy
• Galaxies produce new stars., john
  • Re: Galaxies produce new stars., eric gisse
    • Re: Galaxies produce new stars., john
      • Re: Galaxies produce new stars., Uncle Al
  • Re: Galaxies produce new stars., Sam Wormley
    • Re: Galaxies produce new stars., john
      • Re: Galaxies produce new stars., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Galaxies produce new stars., Sam Wormley
• Can sci.physics.electromag be saved from all those advertisements?, John Polasek
  • Re: Can sci.physics.electromag be saved from all those advertisements?, Benj
• Solution Manual and Testbank, Kevin Norton
• The Eagle found on the crests of state of many nations, Automutt
• Re:  TJ, please give me the tracking number., Aleph
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Nredom
  • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Uncle Al
• adiabatic foam, John O'Flaherty
  • Re: adiabatic foam, Cwatters
    • Re: adiabatic foam, Androcles
• IJAMAS Special Issue on q-series: theory and applications, baggi
• What if (on LHC), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on LHC), Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: What if (on LHC), PD
    • Re: What if (on LHC), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on LHC), PD
      • Re: What if (on LHC), BradGuth
      • Re: What if (on LHC), PD
      • Re: What if (on LHC), BradGuth
      • Re: What if (on LHC), PD
  • Re: What if (on LHC), Uncle Al
  • Re: What if (on LHC), Paul Cardinale
  • Re: What if (on LHC), Igor
    • Re: What if (on LHC), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on LHC), Sam Wormley
    • Re: What if (on LHC), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on LHC), BradGuth
      • Re: What if (on LHC), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if (on LHC), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on LHC), Aleph
      • Re: What if (on LHC), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on LHC), Aleph
      • Re: What if (on LHC), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on LHC), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if (on LHC), Aleph
      • Re: What if (on LHC), BradGuth
      • Re: What if (on LHC), tj Frazir
      • Re: What if (on LHC), tj Frazir
      • Re: What if (on LHC), tj Frazir
      • Re: What if (on LHC), BradGuth
  • Re: What if (on LHC), BradGuth
• The tangled SRT., socratus
  • Re: The tangled SRT., Androcles
  • Re: The tangled SRT., Uncle Al
• Re: Black Holes physicsup.com, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
• Pressure in fluids – simple model - simple question, Clive
  • Re: Pressure in fluids – simple model - simple question, Cwatters
    • Re: Pressure in fluids – simple model - simple question, eratosthenes
  • Re: Pressure in fluids – simple model - simple question, jbriggs444
  • Re: Pressure in fluids ? simple model - simple question, Uncle Al
  • Re: Pressure in fluids – simple model - simple question, John Polasek
    • Re: Pressure in fluids - simple model - simple question, Cwatters
      • Re: Pressure in fluids - simple model - simple question, Androcles
      • Re: Pressure in fluids - simple model - simple question, tj Frazir
      • Re: Pressure in fluids - simple model - simple question, Aleph
    • Re: Pressure in fluids – simple model - simple question, John Polasek
  • Re: Pressure in fluids – simple model - simple question, PD
• Quantum Gravity 342.9: Lawrence Berkeley National Lab USA Theorizes Infinite Light Speed Scenarios From Anisotropic Space vs Time, OsherD
• Re:  TJ, please give me the tracking number., tj Frazir
• Re:  http://google.com/images?q=Whale.Steam.Engine, tj Frazir
  • Re:  http://google.com/images?q=Whale.Steam.Engine, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  http://google.com/images?q=Whale.Steam.Engine, tj Frazir
• Re:  http://google.com/images?q=Steam+Water+Rocket, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 342.8: Fraudulent versus Real Torsion Quantum Gravity, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 342.8: Fraudulent versus Real Torsion Quantum Gravity, OsherD
• Re:thanks colorado, tj Frazir
• photomultiplier qu., road12fg
  • Re: photomultiplier qu., Uncle Al
  • Re: photomultiplier qu., Benj
    • Re: photomultiplier qu., Uncle Al
      • Re: photomultiplier qu., Benj
• Lambda and combustion temperature., Murmur
• Commutation of gamma matrices, Mapsread
  • Re: Commutation of gamma matrices-, JEMebius
    • Re: Commutation of gamma matrices-, Mapsread
      • Re: Commutation of gamma matrices--, JEMebius
  • Re: Commutation of gamma matrices, Igor
• Re:  I think Aleph is either Art Deco or T. Wake... maybe both., Inertial
• Re:  I've been trying ( 4 times now ) to get Google·Groups to a..., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  I've been trying ( 4 times now ) to get Google·Groups to a..., tj Frazir
• Re: US Bank Tower Seattle, tj Frazir
  • Re: US Bank Tower Seattle, tj Frazir
• Re:  Can Windows (Live) Mail post hand·crafted HTML ?, tj Frazir
• Re: The Jeff earned 20 mil plus bonus, tj Frazir
• Re: ?Gravity? is the ( 4·D ) structure of the KNOWN universe., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
  • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, PD
    • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Androcles
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, PD
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Greg Neill
  • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Greg Neill
    • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Greg Neill
  • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Androcles
  • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, John Polasek
    • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, John Polasek
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
  • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Greg Neill
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, PD
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, PD
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Greg Neill
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, jbriggs444
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
  • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, PD
    • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, Peter
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, PD
      • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, John Polasek
  • Re: Kinetic energy in terms of force and distance, gudi
• Black Holes, physicsup.com
  • Re: Black Holes, Uncle Al
• CYGNUS-A and entropy decease., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: CYGNUS-A and entropy decease., Uncle Al
    • Re: CYGNUS-A and entropy decease., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Whale Steam Engine 3, tj Frazir
• Re: Re:  How one gets an image to show up via a Google-Images se..., tj Frazir
• Re:  Like TJ, Moroney the Moron can't update his news·reader., tj Frazir
• "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details.", Automutt
  • Re: "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details.", Puppet_Sock
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 8, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 8, johnreed, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 8, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 8, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 8, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 8, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Why can't TJ Frazir show ( much less sell ) his engines ?, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why can't TJ Frazir show ( much less sell ) his engines ?, tj Frazir
    • Re: Why do you refuse to do it and want paid ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Why do you refuse to do it and want paid ?, Aleph
  • Re: Why can't TJ Frazir show ( much less sell ) his engines ?, tj Frazir
• Re:  Why can't TJ Frazir show ( much less sell ) his engines ?, tj Frazir
• Hypermatrix Inverse, Bradster
• Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
  • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Uncle Al
    • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
  • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Sebastian Garth
    • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
  • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., PD
    • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
      • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., PD
      • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
      • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
      • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., PD
      • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
      • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Sebastian Garth
      • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
  • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Physics Form
    • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
  • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., tadchem
    • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., Huang
    • Re: Causality and a-causality are equivalent., jmfbahciv
• Quantum Gravity 342.7: Schrodinger and the Local 3-Dimensional Coordinates, OsherD
• An alternate form of the classical dynamics., Cornel Nicolai KANYA
  • Re: An alternate form of the classical dynamics., tadchem
• Re: Albert Einstein... he's the bomb!, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 342.6: The Reverse Anthropic Principle, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 342.6: The Reverse Anthropic Principle, OsherD
• Re: nothing, BDR-529
  • Re: nothing, tadchem
    • Re: nothing, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: nothing, tadchem
    • Re: nothing, sanboz
• Re: TJ Frazir is flat broke., tj Frazir
  • Re: TJ Frazir is flat broke., Aleph
• Re: Opposing Forces, Uncle Al
  • Re: Opposing Forces, Benj
    • Re: Opposing Forces, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Opposing Forces, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: the united religions of a divided man, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the united religions of a divided man, tj Frazir
• Re: The REAL Culprit Is Water Vapour, tj Frazir
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 9 November 2009 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• Re: extrapolating full length of a partial bone fossil; inbreeding ..., tj Frazir
• Re: OT: Eat The Rich!, tj Frazir
  • Re: OT: Eat The Rich!, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OT: Eat The Rich!, tj Frazir
  • Re: OT: Eat The Rich!, tj Frazir
• Re:  By â??GOOGLINGâ?? I mean a NORMAL Google/Yahoo/Baidu/whate..., tj Frazir
• SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
  • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, Uncle Al
  • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
  • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, Physics Form
    • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
      • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, Physics Form
      • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
      • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
      • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
      • Re: SCI Dumbasses Sam Fraud, tj Frazir
      • Re: SCI Sam AL kiss my ass morons, tj Frazir
      • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
  • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, HardySpicer
    • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
    • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
    • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
    • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, tj Frazir
  • Re: SCI Dumbasses Like Uncle AL, Aleph
• satellite around moon, earth and sun, gudi
  • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, Sam Wormley
  • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, tadchem
  • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, Physics Form
  • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, BDR-529
    • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, gudi
      • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, Sam Wormley
      • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, BDR-529
      • Re: satellite around moon, earth and sun, tadchem
• an orbit around earth, moon and sun, gudi
  • Re: an orbit around earth, moon and sun, Sam Wormley
• Re: Understanding Black Holes, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Understanding Black Holes, tj Frazir
  • Re: Understanding Black Holes, tj Frazir
  • Re: Understanding Black Holes, tj Frazir
  • Re: Understanding Black Holes, tj Frazir
  • Re: Understanding Black Holes, tj Frazir
• Re:  Sam Wormley and Uncle Al work at homeland, tj Frazir
• Re: Life is notional, not real., BradGuth
• Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ranking., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ranking., tj Frazir
    • Re:  They killed jeff ?, tj Frazir
    • Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ranking., Aleph
      • Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ran..., tj Frazir
      • Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ran..., tj Frazir
      • Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ran..., tj Frazir
      • Re: now jeff gets paid. 20 mil., tj Frazir
      • Re: now jeff gets paid. 20 mil., Aleph
      • Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ran..., tj Frazir
      • Re:  The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ran..., tj Frazir
• Re: Bert and TJ do it right ( by accident )., BradGuth
• Re:  How one gets an image to show up via a Google-Images search., tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re:  Like TJ, Moroney the Moron can't update his news·reader., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re:  Re: Like TJ, Moroney the Moron can't update his news·reader., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re:  Re: Like TJ, Moroney the Moron can't update his news·reader., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re:  Michael Moroney, shake off those RFC·blues., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who died and made Windows-1252 king ?, Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: “X.ZIP” ranks NNTP clients/servers thusly:, Aleph
• Re:  NEWS FLASH: No one believes TJ'd give me a dime., tj Frazir
  • Re:  NEWS FLASH: No one believes TJ'd give me a dime., Aleph
• Re: Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana ..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana ..., Sam Wormley
• New black hole paradigm for dark matter ring around Cl 0024+17, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New black hole paradigm for dark matter ring around Cl 0024+17, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New black hole paradigm for dark matter ring around Cl 0024+17, Sam Wormley
  • Re: New black hole paradigm for dark matter ring around Cl 0024+17, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New black hole paradigm for dark matter ring around Cl 0024+17, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 342.5: Japan and USA Relate exp(kt), exp(-kt) to Quantum Gravity, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 342.5: Japan and USA Relate exp(kt), exp(-kt) to Quantum Gravity, OsherD
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 342.5: Japan and USA Relate exp(kt), exp(-kt) to Quantum Gravity, OsherD
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 3, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 3, johnreed, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 3, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
• May We Remember...?, Automutt
• methane specific gravity, muser
  • Re: methane specific gravity, Androcles
  • Re: methane specific gravity, tadchem
  • Re: methane specific gravity, Uncle Al
    • Re: methane specific gravity, muser
• Re:  Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., Aleph
    • Re: US Bank Tower seattle 200 mil jeff, tj Frazir
  • Re: SeaFirst Bank seattle wa, tj Frazir
    • Re: SeaFirst Bank seattle wa, tj Frazir
      • Re: SeaFirst Bank seattle wa, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Water Turbine Train Engines, Aleph
    • Re: SeaFirst Bank seattle Hide can se it, tj Frazir
    • Re: SeaFirst Bank seattle wa, tj Frazir
    • Re: SeaFirst Bank seattle wa, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., tj Frazir
    • Re:  Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., Aleph
  • Re:  Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., tj Frazir
• JSH: But how can the Internet go down?, JSH
  • Re: JSH: But how can the Internet go down?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: But how can the Internet go down?, sanboz
  • Re: JSH: But how can the Internet go down?, Uncle Al
  • Re: JSH: But how can the Internet go down?, tadchem
  • Re: JSH: But how can the Internet go down?, Noob
• JSH: Internet defensive response theory, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Internet defensive response theory, Uncle Al
  • Re: JSH: Internet defensive response theory, William Hughes
• "Corrections to Special Relativity", Rohtau
  • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Uncle Al
• Lame Lame Lame - your physics is LAME, Huang
  • Re: Lame Lame Lame - your physics is LAME, Uncle Al
    • Re: Lame Lame Lame - your physics is LAME, Huang
      • Re: Lame Lame Lame - your physics is LAME, jimp
• OT - Three scientists in heaven., BDR-529
• Quantum Gravity 342.4: Simon Lhuilier's Generalization of Euler's Polyhedral Formula May Be in the Direction of Mass, OsherD
• Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Energy-Ingenuity
  • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, tadchem
    • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Energy-Ingenuity
      • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Androcles
      • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Energy-Ingenuity
      • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Androcles
  • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, nuny@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Energy-Ingenuity
  • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, larryllix
    • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Energy-Ingenuity
    • Re: Does anyone know what "wardforce" is?, Energy-Ingenuity
• JSH: So Crank.net really works?, JSH
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: So Crank.net really works?, JSH
      • Re: JSH: So Crank.net really works?, sanboz
  • Re: JSH: So Crank.net really works?, doug
    • Re: JSH: So Crank.net really works?, JSH
      • Re: JSH: So Crank.net really works?, doug
• Basic optics question (maybe a trick question), 2.7182818284590...
  • Re: Basic optics question (maybe a trick question), Greg Neill
    • Re: Basic optics question (maybe a trick question), 2.7182818284590...
      • Re: Basic optics question (maybe a trick question), Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: Basic optics question (maybe a trick question), Cwatters
• Re: whale engines ., tj Frazir
• Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
    • Re: Mystery buyer wants fleet, tj Frazir
    • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
      • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., Aleph
    • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
      • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
      • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
      • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
      • Message not available
      • Re: Google "whale Steam Engine", it's first-up in the list., Aleph
      • TGOTB whale 1, tj Frazir
      • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
    • Re:  Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., tj Frazir
• Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., tj Frazir
  • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., tj Frazir
    • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., Autymn D. C.
  • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., tj Frazir
  • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., tj Frazir
    • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., Autymn D. C.
    • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., Raymond Yohros
  • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., socratus
    • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., Aleph
      • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., Media Watcher
  • Re: CERN, LHC. The End is soon., Aleph
• Re: Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana Tr..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Rohtau
  • Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Uncle Al
  • Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", MarMitMus
• Infrared electric heaters, Roberto Deboni
  • Re: Infrared electric heaters, sanboz
  • Re: Infrared electric heaters, Cwatters
• Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, Androcles
  • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, eratosthenes
  • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, Sam Wormley
    • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, Ray Vickson
      • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, sanboz
      • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, tadchem
      • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, tadchem
  • Re: How far will the GOLF BALL travel, tadchem
• Quantum Gravity 342.3: Mass As a Space-Time-like Real "Dimension", OsherD
• Large Hadron Collider suffers carb attack, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Large Hadron Collider suffers carb attack, greysky
    • Re: Large Hadron Collider suffers carb attack, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Large Hadron Collider suffers carb attack, cone zero
  • Re: Large Hadron Collider suffers carb attack, Yousuf Khan
    • Re: Large Hadron Collider suffers carb attack, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Large Hadron Collider suffers carb attack, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The signature of positrons has been found for the first time in gamma rays associated with storms on Earth., Sam Wormley
  • Re: The signature of positrons has been found for the first time in gammarays associated with storms on Earth., Yousuf Khan
    • Re: The signature of positrons has been found for the first time in gammarays associated with storms on Earth., eric gisse
• New physics theory - physicsup.com, physicsup.com
  • Re: New physics theory - physicsup.com, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • New physics theory - physicsup.com, physicsup.com
    • Re: New physics theory - physicsup.com, Uncle Al
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 6 Nov 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• hugonews i'm crying, Hugonews
• websites for galaxy distributions and density #177 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory, Archimedes Plutonium
• Re: Ten Evidences in favor of my thesis, Uncle Al
• The clock and the maker..., Automutt
• Re:  whale steam engine 2, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  whale steam engine 2, tj Frazir
• Re:OK LETS BUILD A NUKE, tj Frazir
  • Re:OK LETS BUILD A NUKE, Aleph
• At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., john
  • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., john
    • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
      • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., john
    • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., Sam Wormley
      • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., eric gisse
  • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., Magnetic
  • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., PD
  • Re: At the center of each galaxy and each atom is total void., Uncle Al
• whale steam engine 2, tj Frazir
  • Re: whale steam engine 2, tj Frazir
    • Message not available
      • Re: Others, trusted scientists, must VERIFY TJ's engines., Aleph
• gravity is a fictious force..., Tom
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Sam Wormley
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., PD
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Igor
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Uncle Al
    • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Tom
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Tom
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Uncle Al
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Tom
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Tom
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., eric gisse
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Mahipal7638
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Tom
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Uncle Al
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., eric gisse
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Mahipal7638
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., eric gisse
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force...Darla & AA please read my last post, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Sam Wormley
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Uncle Al
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., eric gisse
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., tj Frazir
    • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Autymn D. C.
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Jim Black
    • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Tom
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., glird
  • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Raymond Yohros
    • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Uncle Al
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Raymond Yohros
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., tj Frazir
      • Re: gravity is a fictious force..., Raymond Yohros
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Rohtau
  • Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", MMM
  • Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Horse Challenges Dark Matter to Explain Missing Matter, gb
• Re: A 20 solar mass neutron star is discovered!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: A 20 solar mass neutron star is discovered!, Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 342.2: Kaku of USA on Nanoships, and Their Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Basis, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 342.2: Kaku of USA on Nanoships, and Their Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Basis, OsherD
• EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 15/11/2009, europa
• a particle moving in an electromagnetic field, Ignacio Plazeta
  • Re: a particle moving in an electromagnetic field, Ray Vickson
    • Re: a particle moving in an electromagnetic field, Ray Vickson
      • Re: a particle moving in an electromagnetic field, Ignacio Plazeta
      • Re: a particle moving in an electromagnetic field, Androcles
• Physics and Anomalies., socratus
  • Re: Physics and Anomalies., nuny@xxxxxxx
• ECCM2010 Mini-Symposium on Image Processing and Visualization, tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, Jarek Duda
  • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, Uncle Al
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, Jarek Duda
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, john
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, john
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, john
      • Re: Can we be sure that large electric charge doesn't cause time dilation?, john
• Gamma-ray sources guide astronomers to pulsars, Sam Wormley
• Most Distant Stuff?, Sam Wormley
• Re: Two clocks; one moving past the other at high speed, Ralph Garbage
• Collidonomics, Sam Wormley
• Re: Google rules., tj Frazir
• Boxer Shorts...., Automutt
• Re:  Using your PC, look at MY post ( not yours, TJ )., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Using your PC, look at MY post ( not yours, TJ )., tj Frazir
• Re: A 'Strong Force' Snipe Hunt?, Timo Nieminen
• Your so stupid, tj Frazir
  • Re: Your so stupid, Aleph
    • Re: Your so stupid, Matthew Lybanon
      • Re: Your so stupid, tj Frazir
• YOUR TOO FUCKING STUPID, tj Frazir
• Re:Dumbasses dont trust math, tj Frazir
• Re:  << whats that ¿ for, tj Frazir
• Re: Шhâ£ë, tj Frazir
• Re:  Re: whale steam engine 3, tj Frazir
  • Re:  Re: whale steam engine 3, tj Frazir
• Re: ? A JEW NAMED MOHAMMED !, Uncle Al
• La géométrie Quantique de l' EspaceTemps Le modèle de Relativité Quantique,, Q_Gravity
  • Re: La géométrie Quantique de l' EspaceTemps Le modèle de Relativité Quantique,, Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity space drive is here, nuny@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Antigravity space drive is here, eric gisse
  • Re: Antigravity space drive is here, Benj
    • Re: Antigravity space drive is here, eric gisse
    • Re: Antigravity space drive is here, nuny@xxxxxxx
• "The Matter of"Dark Matter", Rohtau
  • Re: "The Matter of"Dark Matter", nuny@xxxxxxx
  • Re: "The Matter of"Dark Matter", Uncle Al
• Re: I enjoy TJ's posts, they make me think., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I enjoy TJ's posts, they make me think., tj Frazir
    • Re: I enjoy TJ's posts, they make me think., Aleph
• Re: ? A JEW NAMED MOHAMMED !, Uncle Al
• At the Event Horizon of a rotating Black Hole, spacetime travels at c, john
  • Re: At the Event Horizon of a rotating Black Hole, spacetime travels at c, Uncle Al
  • Re: At the Event Horizon of a rotating Black Hole, spacetime travels at c, Sam Wormley
    • Re: At the Event Horizon of a rotating Black Hole, spacetime travels at c, john
      • Re: At the Event Horizon of a rotating Black Hole, spacetime travels at c, Sam Wormley
      • Re: At the Event Horizon of a rotating Black Hole, spacetime travels at c, john
      • Re: At the Event Horizon of a rotating Black Hole, spacetime travels at c, Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity is pushing atoms, tj Frazir
  • Re: Gravity is pushing atoms, tj Frazir
• Giant galaxy graveyard grows, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Giant galaxy graveyard grows, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: Giant galaxy graveyard grows, john
    • Re: Giant galaxy graveyard grows, Sam Wormley
• whale steam engine 3, tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Re: Re: whale steam engine 3, Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: A credible source must reproduce TJ's engine., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thanks to TJ and me, Googling "Whale Steam Engine" produces may hits., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: By “GOOGLING” I mean a NORMAL Google/Yahoo/Baidu/whatever search., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: The less people search-for/load a pic, the lower its ranking., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re:  PageRank is just ONE of the ways Google ranks pages,, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • whale Steam Engine 3, tj Frazir
    • Re: whale Steam Engine 3, Aleph
    • Message not available
      • Re: NEWS FLASH: No one believes TJ'd give me a dime., Aleph
    • Re: whale Steam Engine 3, tj Frazir
• Re:  whale steam engine 3, tj Frazir
  • Re:  whale steam engine 3, Aleph
• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DESPERATION PEE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, Quinton Cole
• Quantum Gravity 342.1: Generalizing 342.0 to dy/dt = A + By + Cy^2, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 342.0: Solution of dy/dt = rexp(-kt), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 342.0: Solution of dy/dt = rexp(-kt), OsherD
• String Theory Summarized, Sam Wormley
  • Re: String Theory Summarized, Uncle Al
• Re:  Re: MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Re: MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., Aleph
• Re:  An irReproducible claim from an anonymous person carries no..., tj Frazir
  • Re:  An irReproducible claim from an anonymous person carries no..., Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  An irReproducible claim from an anonymous person carries no..., tj Frazir
    • Re:  An Reproducible claim from anyone, tj Frazir
      • Re:water forced at 1000 psi out 1 inch hole, tj Frazir
  • Re:  An irReproducible claim from an anonymous person carries no..., tj Frazir
• Re:  An stupid moron like ABA, tj Frazir
  • Re:  An stupid moron like ABA, Aleph
• Re:  Well-Respected sites require VERIFIED results., tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Re: Re: whale steam engine 3, Aleph
• Physicsup.com-- Today first chapter of the theory, physicsup.com
  • Re: Physicsup.com-- Today first chapter of the theory, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: Physicsup.com-- Today first chapter of the theory, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: Physicsup.com-- Today first chapter of the theory, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: Physicsup.com-- Today first chapter of the theory, Uncle Al
• Anisotropy of the forces exerted by elementary particles, Carlos L
  • Re: Anisotropy of the forces exerted by elementary particles, Uncle Al
    • Re: Anisotropy of the forces exerted by elementary particles, Carlos L
• La géométrie Quantique de l' EspaceTemps. Le modèle de Relativité Quantique,, Q_Gravity
  • Re: La géométrie Quantique de l' EspaceTemps. Le modèle de Relativité Quantique,, Uncle Al
• hugonews im crying, Hugonews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • hugonews im crying, Hugonews
• "Gravity", Rohtau
  • Re: "Gravity", Uncle Al
• Help undertanding the Uncertainty Principle, Ricardo Massaro
  • Re: Help undertanding the Uncertainty Principle, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Help undertanding the Uncertainty Principle, Ricardo Massaro
  • Re: Help undertanding the Uncertainty Principle, PD
• Re: Playning with magnets and their equal strength, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., tj Frazir
    • Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., Aleph
  • Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., tj Frazir
  • Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., tj Frazir
    • Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., Aleph
  • Re:  Netbooks are larger than a cell-phone but smaller than a no..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re:  Niagra Falls might put Bert in a wheel-chair, like Stephen ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• whale steam engine - Google Images, tj Frazir
  • Re: whale steam engine - Google Images, Aleph
  • Re: whale steam engine - Google Images, Aleph
• Re: Verifiable results. for iq over 5, tj Frazir
  • Re: Verifiable results. for iq over 5, Aleph
• Re:  unVerifiable results., tj Frazir
  • Re:  unVerifiable results., Aleph
• Re:  Water-Rocket powered Whale Steam Engine, Doble boiler, slid..., tj Frazir
  • Message not available
    • Re: Well-Respected sites require VERIFIED results., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lots of sites point to “Alt.Free.Newsservers”., Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Water-Rocket powered Whale Steam Engine, Doble boiler, slid..., tj Frazir
    • Re:  Water-Rocket powered Whale Steam Engine, Doble boiler, slid..., Aleph
• Re: Whale Steam Engine, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Whale Steam Engine, tj Frazir
• Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
  • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
  • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, jbriggs444
    • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
    • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Robert Higgins
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Molecular oscillation (vibrations?) without heat exchange?, JT
• Quantum Gravity 341.92: Remarkable Papers From Canada, Spain, Portugal on (1) Holes vs Blocks, (2) Separating Expansion From Contraction, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 341.91: Does The Whole Riccati Differential Equation dy/dt = A(t) + B(t)y + C(t)y^2 Relate to exp(kt)?, OsherD
• Re:  No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., BradGuth
  • Re:  No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., Sam Wormley
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., tj Frazir
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., Tom Potter
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., Sam Wormley
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., Tom Potter
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., tj Frazir
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., Tom Potter
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., tj Frazir
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who is TJ Frazir ?, Aleph
      • Re: Who is TJ Frazir ?, BradGuth
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who is TJ Frazir ?, BradGuth
      • Message not available
      • Re:  Who is TJ Frazir ?, Tom Potter
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., tj Frazir
      • Re: ? No one here builds engines, not even Sam Wormley or Uncle Al., tj Frazir
• Re: The Tholen bot, Sam Wormley, Brad Guth and Uncle Al., BradGuth
• MIS Cases Decision Making wih Application Software, 4E solutions and Instructors manual, kevin norton
• 2 of the Greatest Mysteries of Quantum Physics solved (Uncertainty Principle) and (sqrt-1), cjcountess
  • Re: 2 of the Greatest Mysteries of Quantum Physics solved (Uncertainty Principle) and (sqrt-1), Uncle Al
    • Re: 2 of the Greatest Mysteries of Quantum Physics solved (Uncertainty Principle) and (sqrt-1), cjcountess
      • Re: 2 of the Greatest Mysteries of Quantum Physics solved (Uncertainty Principle) and (sqrt-1), Uncle Al
      • Re: 2 of the Greatest Mysteries of Quantum Physics solved (Uncertainty Principle) and (sqrt-1), cjcountess
• can you imagine the size of dedanoe's CERN FACILITY..., Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: can you imagine the size of dedanoe's CERN FACILITY..., tadchem
    • Re: can you imagine the size of dedanoe's CERN FACILITY..., Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
• Re:  MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., tj Frazir
    • Re:  MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: Re: MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., Aleph
      • Re: Re: MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., Aleph
      • Re: Re: MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., Aleph
  • Re:  MSN-TV's screen is 560 pixels wide... I have 1,280 pixels., tj Frazir
• Re: Funny article about Higgs and LHC in NY times, cjcountess
• Re:  I enjoy TJ's posts, they make me think., tj Frazir
• Re:  M/Y Eclipse is much heavier and its steel hull isn't trimaran., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  M/Y Eclipse is much heavier and its steel hull isn't trimaran., tj Frazir
  • Re:  M/Y Eclipse is much heavier and its steel hull isn't trimaran., tj Frazir
    • Message not available
      • Re: unVerifiable results., Aleph
• Re: USSR REVIVAL: their black (cherno) destiny (sudba) was (bill) ..., tj Frazir
• analizing ft=1 i foresaw it before Y2K, the revelation weakened me once but later on i became twice stronger, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Rohtau
  • Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", PD
  • Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Uncle Al
• Shocking Seas... ;), Automutt
• JSH: JSH PLONK rate in sci physics over 99 percent, Remcheese
  • Re: JSH: JSH PLONK rate in sci physics over 99 percent, Mark Murray
• Ohmasa Gas, Cwatters
• Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, tadchem
    • Re: Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, Androcles
      • Re: Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, tadchem
      • Re: Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, Androcles
      • Re: Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, Uncle Al
      • Re: Mount Kilimanjaro could soon be bald, tadchem
• Re: Paul Draper stole my book !!, Gordon Stangler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Paul Draper stole my book !!, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Paul Draper stole my book !!, David Bostwick
  • Re: Paul Draper stole my book !!, Aleph
  • Re: Paul Draper stole my book !!, Y.Porat
  • Re: Paul Draper stole my book !!, Aleph
  • Re: Paul Draper stole my book !!, Aleph
• Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, 2.7182818284590...
  • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, John Polasek
      • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, John Polasek
      • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, John Polasek
      • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, Androcles
  • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, Androcles
  • Re: Questions on the Doppler Effect Equation, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 341.9: Proof That Probable Causation/Influence Increases with Newtonian Gravitational Force, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 341.9: Proof That Probable Causation/Influence Increases with Newtonian Gravitational Force, OsherD
• Virtual Universes, Virtuosity
  • Re: Virtual Universes, Uncle Al
    • Message not available
      • Re: Virtual Universes, Uncle Al
• The Quantum Geometry of the Spacetime, Model of Quantum Relativity, Q_Gravity
  • Re: The Quantum Geometry of the Spacetime, Model of Quantum Relativity, tj Frazir
    • Re: The Quantum Geometry of the Spacetime, Model of QuantumRelativity, Uncle Al
  • Re: The Quantum Geometry of the Spacetime, Model of Quantum Relativity, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Quantum Geometry of the Spacetime, Model of Quantum Relativity, Q_Gravity
      • Re: The Quantum Geometry of the Spacetime, Model of Quantum Relativity, Uncle Al
• We cannot go back in time "The Direction of TIME is CONSTANT", cjcountess
  • Re: We cannot go back in time "The Direction of TIME is CONSTANT", Uncle Al
    • Re: We cannot go back in time "The Direction of TIME is CONSTANT", cjcountess
      • Re: We cannot go back in time "The Direction of TIME is CONSTANT", Tim BandTech.com
      • Re: We cannot go back in time "The Direction of TIME is CONSTANT", Uncle Al
      • Re: We cannot go back in time "The Direction of TIME is CONSTANT", G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: We cannot go back in time "The Direction of TIME is CONSTANT", Sam Wormley
• Re: Welding Cast to Steel, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Welding Cast to Steel, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Welding Cast to Steel, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Welding Cast to Steel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Welding Cast to Steel, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Welding Cast to Steel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Welding Cast to Steel, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Welding Cast to Steel, Huang
• New physics theory _ Physicsup.com, physicsup.com
  • Re: New physics theory _ Physicsup.com, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: New physics theory _ Physicsup.com, Uncle Al
    • Re: New physics theory _ Physicsup.com, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: New physics theory _ Physicsup.com, Sam Wormley
      • Re: New physics theory _ Physicsup.com, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Rohtau
  • Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Uncle Al
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 6, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 6, johnreed, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 6, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 6, johnreed, johnlawrencereedjr
    • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 6, johnreed, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 341.8: The Weak and Repulsive Interactions Explained by 2 Monopole and a Dual Dipole Time Axis, With Help From Gottingen, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 341.8: The Weak and Repulsive Interactions Explained by 2 Monopole and a Dual Dipole Time Axis, With Help From Gottingen, OsherD
• Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, Yousuf Khan
    • Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, john
      • Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, john
      • Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Astronomers bust star mass ratio myth, Yousuf Khan
• Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? s..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Aleph
    • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Aleph
  • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Igor
    • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), tj Frazir
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Aleph
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Aleph
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), eric gisse
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), eric gisse
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on Gravity again), eric gisse
    • Re: What if (on Gravity again), G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What if (on Gravity again), tj Frazir
• Is relativity so relative?, Marvin Barley
  • Re: Is relativity so relative?, jbriggs444
  • Re: Is relativity so relative?, Igor
  • Re: Is relativity so relative?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Is relativity so relative?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Is relativity so relative?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Is relativity so relative?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Is relativity so relative?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Is relativity so relative?, Sam Wormley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Semi-Randomness is imprecise measurement, nothing more., Aleph
  • Re: Is relativity so relative?, PD
  • Re: Is relativity so relative?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is relativity so relative?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Is relativity so relative?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why is my microwave oven a rectabgular prism?, Peter Webb
  • Re: Why is my microwave oven a rectabgular prism?, eric gisse
  • Re: Why is my microwave oven a rectabgular prism?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 341.7: Ideal Gas Law and Cosmological Equations of State as Linear, OsherD
• Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? scifc amer?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: when is jug element hottest-- pour boiling water on teabag ?? ..., tj Frazir
• JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, JSH
  • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, Rotwang
    • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, JSH
      • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, doug
      • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, Mark Murray
      • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, ronchese
      • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, JSH
      • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, Mark Murray
  • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, doug
  • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, eric gisse
  • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
  • Re: JSH And I ALWAYS beat them, ronchese
  • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, Noob
  • Re: JSH: And I ALWAYS beat them, Uncle Al
• Re: Discovery of Higgs at Large Hadron Collider might not make all ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What can you do with a physics degree?, tj Frazir
• Re:  TJ, when your pics show up at Google-Images, I'll let you k..., tj Frazir
  • Re: Jet ski 4 cyl 6000 rpm, tj Frazir
  • Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up at Google-Images, I'll let you k..., Aleph
    • Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up at Google-Images, I'll let y..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up at Google-Images, I'll let y..., Aleph
      • Re: Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up at Google-Images, I'll l..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up at Google-Images, I'll l..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up at Google-Images, I'll l..., tj Frazir
  • Re:  TJ, when your pics show up atGoogle-Images, I'll let you k..., hanson
    • Re:  TJ, when your pics show up atGoogle-Images, I'll let you k..., tj Frazir
    • Re:  TJ, when your pics show up atGoogle-Images, I'll let you k..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up atGoogle-Images, I'll let you k..., Aleph
    • Re:  TJ, when your pics show up atGoogle-Images, I'll let you k..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re:  TJ, when your pics show up atGoogle-Images, I'll let you k..., Aleph
    • Re:  TJ, Hanson idiot 1, tj Frazir
      • Re:  TJ, Hanson idiot 1, tj Frazir
      • Re:  TJ, Hanson idiot 1, tj Frazir
• Re: Waterpumps warfare, tj Frazir
• JSH: How I got leverage, JSH
  • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, JSH
    • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, JSH
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, Enrico
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, JSH
  • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, Noob
    • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, cjcountess
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, Enrico
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, cjcountess
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, Uncle Al
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, JSH
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, JSH
      • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, Uncle Al
  • Re: JSH: How I got leverage, Uncle Al
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Riaper
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Just Me
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Uncle Al
• JSH: Mathematics, an abused brand?, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Mathematics, an abused brand?, francesca.niccoli@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: Mathematics, an abused brand?, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Mathematics, an abused brand?, Uncle Al
• Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, tj Frazir
  • Re: Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, Aleph
    • Re: Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, Aleph
    • Re: Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, Aleph
    • Re: Re:  Aleph, water jet ship 50 mph, tj Frazir
    • Re: Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Re:  Aleph, where's the photo of your ugly mug ?, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 341.6: Hamilton's Principle of Least Action, Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Maximization, and Maximum Entropy Principles Related, OsherD
• Re: Proposed and Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposed and Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion., tj Frazir
• Turing Machines and Humankind, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Turing Machines and Humankind, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Turing Machines and Humankind, GO-HERE .NL
    • Re: Turing Machines and Humankind, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Turing Machines and Humankind, GO-HERE .NL
      • Re: Turing Machines and Humankind, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Turing Machines and Humankind, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inertial propulsion, JT
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Inertial propulsion, JT
• Re: Waterpumps, JT
  • Re: Waterpumps, tadchem
    • Re: Waterpumps, JT
      • Re: Waterpumps, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Waterpumps, tj Frazir
      • Re: Waterpumps, JT
      • Re: Waterpumps, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Waterpumps, JT
      • Re: Waterpumps, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Waterpumps, JT
      • Re: Waterpumps, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Waterpumps, JT
      • Re: Waterpumps, tj Frazir
      • Re: Waterpumps, tj Frazir
      • Re: Waterpumps 277 HP stove burner, TJ Indianlake
      • Re: Waterpumps 277 HP stove burner, tj Frazir
      • Re: Waterpumps 277 HP stove burner, tj Frazir
      • Re: Waterpumps 277 HP stove burner, tj Frazir
      • Re: Waterpumps 277 HP stove burner, tj Frazir
      • Message not available
      • Re:  M/Y Eclipse is much heavier and its steel hull isn't trimaran., Aleph
      • Message not available
      • Re: I enjoy TJ's posts, they make me think., Aleph
      • Re: Waterpumps Sam, tj Frazir
  • Re: Waterpumps, tj Frazir
  • Re: Waterpumps whale 1, TJ Indianlake
    • Re: Waterpumps whale 1, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Waterpumps, tj Frazir
  • Re: Waterpumps, tj Frazir
  • Re: Waterpumps, tj Frazir
  • Re: Waterpumps, Benj
• Re: Material properties, oscillators and dampers, JT
  • Re: Material properties, oscillators and dampers, Uncle Al
    • Re: Material properties, oscillators and dampers, JT
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Material properties, oscillators and dampers, JT
• Re: Antigravity VS inertial propulsion, GO-HERE .NL
  • Re: Antigravity VS inertial propulsion, JT
  • Re: Antigravity VS inertial propulsion, JT
• Re: The driving formula of the universe., Billie Gates
  • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
    • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
  • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
    • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Sam Wormley
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
    • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
    • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Billie Gates
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
  • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
    • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Richard Herring
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Phukwit
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Phukwit
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Richard Herring
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Sendme
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Phukwit
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Richard Herring
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Sendme
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Sendme
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Raymond Yohros
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Phukwit
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Raymond Yohros
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Sendme
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Billie Gates
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Raymond Yohros
  • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Billie Gates
  • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
    • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Sam Wormley
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Undisclosed Recipient
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
    • Re: The driving formula of the universe., PD
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., PD
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., Tom Potter
      • Re: The driving formula of the universe., PD
  • Re: The driving formula of the universe., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• JSH: Psychology of perspective, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, eric gisse
    • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, Mark Murray
    • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, Mark Murray
      • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, eric gisse
  • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, Mark Murray
  • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, rossum
    • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, rossum
      • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Psychology of perspective, Uncle Al
• Re:  TJ, you have to not care what morons think, tj Frazir
• Re:  Re: TJ, Google-Images is not the only place your pics are v..., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  Re: TJ, Google-Images is not the only place your pics are v..., tj Frazir
    • Re: Re:  Re: TJ, Google-Images is not the only place your pics are v..., Aleph
      • Re: Re:  Re: TJ, Google-Images is not the only place your pics a..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Re: Re:  Re: TJ, Google-Images is not the only place your pics a..., Aleph
• Quantum Gravity 341.5: Green's Function, Influence Function, Dirac Delta Function, Probable Causation/Influence Related, OsherD
• Re:  TJ, Google-Images is not the only place your pics are viewed !, tj Frazir
• Re:  WikiPedia is MODERATED !, tj Frazir
  • Re:  WikiPedia is MODERATED !, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re:  WikiPedia is MODERATED !, tj Frazir
    • Re:  WikiPedia is MODERATED !, Aleph
      • Re:  WikiPedia is MODERATED !, tj Frazir
      • Re:  WikiPedia is MODERATED !, Aleph
• Re:  People (IP addresses) who've     accessed TJ's pics, last 7 days:, tj Frazir
  • Re:  People (IP addresses) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?who've=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0accessed_TJ's_pics?=, last 7 days:, Aleph
• JSH: Nearing the real fun, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Rotwang
    • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, doug
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Mark Murray
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Rotwang
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Rotwang
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Rotwang
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, JSH
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Rotwang
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, rossum
  • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, doug
    • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, doug
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Lits O'Hate
  • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, ronchese
  • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Mark Murray
  • Re: JSH: Nearing the real fun, Uncle Al
• Re: Appearence in the Mind of God, BURT
  • Re: Appearence in the Mind of God, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Appearence in the Mind of God, Don Stockbauer
    • Re: Appearence in the Mind of God, Aleph
• Re: The Law Of The Universe, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Law Of The Universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: The Law Of The Universe, jdawe
    • Re: The Law Of The Universe, Huang
      • Re: The Law Of The Universe, Energy-Ingenuity
      • Re: The Law Of The Universe, tj Frazir
  • Re: The Law Of The Universe, Raymond Yohros
• The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 9b, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 9b, Uncle Al
• Re: PHYSICS of 2012, Peter Hill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PHYSICS of 2012, tadchem
    • Re: PHYSICS of 2012, Androcles
      • Re: PHYSICS of 2012, tadchem
      • Re: PHYSICS of 2012, Androcles
  • Re: PHYSICS of 2012, tadchem
• Re: Theory of Elementary Waves - A Review, maxwell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Theory of Elementary Waves - A Review, maxwell
• Re: Everything has its own Aether, BURT
  • Re: Everything has its own Aether, Aleph
• Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 9c, johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Discovery of Higgs at Large Hadron Collider might not make all physicists happy, Aleph
  • Re: Discovery of Higgs at Large Hadron Collider might not make all physicists happy, Huang
    • Re: Discovery of Higgs at Large Hadron Collider might not make all physicists happy, Huang
• Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, MichaelW
  • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
    • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, MichaelW
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, MichaelW
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, MichaelW
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, eric gisse
    • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, doug
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, eric gisse
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, eric gisse
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, Aleph
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, Rotwang
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, Aleph
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, Rotwang
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, Aleph
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, Aleph
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, Mark Murray
      • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, rossum
  • Re: JSH: Understanding the betrayal by math people, eric gisse
• Re: galactic cycle, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: galactic cycle, tj Frazir
  • Re: galactic cycle, john
• Re:  I asked for one HTML·Only post., Aleph
• Re:  Mr. Koobee Wublee, who's Mr. Metcalfe ?, Aleph
• Re: The Two times of Einstein's SRT and GRT, Aleph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Two times of Einstein's SRT and GRT, tj Frazir
• Re: Special relativity passes key test, Aleph