JSH: How I got leverage

But it was years ago that I realized it was trivial for a trained
mathematician to see that I had this hugely important discovery, but
despite my showing it to lots of math people, including, yes, grad
students, none of them were behaving properly. Instead they clearly
seemed intent to ignore the result and by so doing, bury it.

So what could I do? I posted about it on Usenet but years ago learned
to see Usenet as more of a working zone to process through ideas and
not as a route to acceptance of them. For instance, I will at times
do early blog posts here, to get details right, and to get a sense of
the writing style I'll use, before I copy them off of Usenet onto my
math blog where I'll do the final editing.

But years were passing so I began to ponder: what mathematics could I
find about which mathematicians could not lie?

And I decided it was the factoring problem.

Trouble is, I GOT a significant result with factoring, but never
pushed it to a complete solution as I figured that it could take a
team of researchers to complete the answer.

Then I got another significant factoring result. This time by
accident as I turned what I call tautological spaces against a
quadratic Diophantine equation, and ended up with a solution to binary
quadratic Diophantine equations.

I was so in whatever state you get to in such a situation that I
didn't even realize that until a Usenet poster pointed it out that if
I had solved binary quadratic Diophantine equation then necessarily
I'd solved xy = T.

I never fully tested that solution. And still haven't. And won't.
It's just out there.

Then I got ANOTHER way to factor from my initial result as I found a
probabilistic way to solve quadratic residues modulo N, where N is a
prime or a composite. Something that is a new major discovery.

So there are 3 possible ways extant.

Cyber-breaches have been growing in frequency.

I know that the math community can do some really weird things. It
has occurred to me that members of the community who happen to also be
cryptoanalysts are simply lying about what his happening, protecting
their system by not telling people if these breaches are from people
cracking the underlying mathematics, which supposedly is still secure.

Because to tell the truth would unravel the lie.

But that means people in even some of the highest levels of US
security are involved and are now traitors to their own country. But
the NSA is reportedly the greatest concentration of mathematicians in
one place on the planet. Maybe there is some weird thing where they
aren't fully conscious of what they're doing. Maybe even believe
they're actually still protecting the country.

For a while I walked around waiting to be killed on the street. I'd
get home and just be glad to still be alive. I'd glance at windows
wondering where a sniper would setup. Wondering...

I don't have a clue any more what is going on here. I have multiple
mathematical results and decided to get leverage when some of them
weren't acknowledged by working at the mathematics underpinning
security systems.

I got results there as well, but stopped short of implementing them.

I began posting more actively on Usenet, when I noticed from Google
Analytics that the world was selecting out those particular pages.

IF there are people around the world who are cracking into US systems
they are being protected by math people in those systems, either
deliberately or unconsciously who are explaining away the breaches in
a way to keep the full story from being known.

But if that is happening it is a stop-gap. Eventually the barbarians
will overwhelm the gates.

I have pondered that there must be a fatalism within the math
community by now. I fear that to some of them losing their system is
not acceptable, and that the world should pay the price.

If so, things are already crazy on a scale almost impossible to
comprehend.

I wonder now if working on the factoring problem was the best thing,
but I never believed that they could take things this far. Never. I
thought simple self-preservation would force the math people to TELL
THE TRUTH.

But make no mistake, if this story is as bad as it may be at this
point, none of us is secure. The doors may be wide open to places all
over the United States with routine breaches occurring in all areas.

And math people lying about them.


James Harris
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: More about using Usenet
    ... then Usenet may be the ONLY really viable means for you to push your ... But substance does matter. ... MATH TO BE RIGHT so that's the easy part. ... Mathematics is a singular discipline. ...
    (sci.math)
  • =?UTF-8?B?2YHYsdmI2LQg2YXYrNmF2YjYudmHINqp2KfZhdmEINqp2KrYp9io2YfYp9uMINix24zYpw==?= =?UTF-8
    ... Probability Theory The Logic of Science, ... Copyright © 1989 by Addison-Wesley Publishing ... Elliptic Curves Number Theory and Cryptography Discrete Mathematics ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)
  • JSH: Usenets world spanning reality
    ... hits to my math blog according to Google Analytics from 94 countries/ ... That Usenet still has a role to play is interesting in and of itself, ... enough to get howls of complaints from posters, posting, to decry all ... Mathematics which has a paper currently under review--as why bother? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Usenets world spanning reality
    ... hits to my math blog according to Google Analytics from 94 countries/ ... That Usenet still has a role to play is interesting in and of itself, ... enough to get howls of complaints from posters, posting, to decry all ... Mathematics which has a paper currently under review--as why bother? ...
    (sci.math)