# Re: What is behind quantum mechanics?

*From*: PD <thedraperfamily@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:30:07 -0800 (PST)

On Dec 15, 6:07 am, pekka.virta...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Albert Einstein did not accept quantum theories. He said that they are

a temporary stage to some other model. For example, the abstract

propability waves of elementary particles were too much for him.

I don't think this was really the issue. Probability waves are no more

complicated than curved spacetime.

What the real issue for Einstein was the principle of locality -- that

two objects that are separated in space are in fact two objects and

that signals are required for a change in one to effect a change in

the other. This is where he was wrong.

The geometric structure of empty space is not a part of quantum

mechanis. Empty space, its lengths and its directions, are not

quantized there. Geometry of empty physical space may have an

essential role to combine quantum mechanics with gravity. According to

the Relativity theory an empy space has some properties. It is more

than nothing.

The structure of empy physical space can be defined cell-structured

and to seem isotropic. It is abolute (, but not the same as Newton's

absolute space) and Lorentz-compatible. It shows that a certain

geometry is standing behind the abstract propability waves and behind

the non-locality of quantum mechanis. It will suggest a new solution

to the gauge problem of quantum mechanics. The solution is in the

space.

More about this subject:

http://www.netikka.net/mpeltonen/siirretyt/tekstit/dtheory.htm

Pekka Virtanen

.

**References**:**What is behind quantum mechanics?***From:*pekka . virtanen

- Prev by Date:
**Re: What in hell happened to Hanson?** - Next by Date:
**Re: Finite Relativism (FR) book** - Previous by thread:
**Re: What is behind quantum mechanics?** - Next by thread:
**What in hell happened to Hanson?** - Index(es):