# Re: Paradox of classical mechanic

*From*: Darwin123 <drosen0000@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 19:42:45 -0800 (PST)

On Jan 3, 10:54 am, Alex <abelov0...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Therefore, these objects asymmetrical behavior cannot be

described by trivial consequence of third Newton’s law.

So what happened to conservation of angular momentum?

Angular momentum also gets conserved due to a trivial consequence of

the third law.

.

**References**:**Paradox of classical mechanic***From:*Alex

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Can we say that the SR and GR theories are untrue** - Next by Date:
**Re: Attractive forces are impossible** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Paradox of classical mechanic** - Next by thread:
**Re: Paradox of classical mechanic** - Index(es):