Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom
From: LaDonna Wyss (hpywife927_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/04/04
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: SS1 flight set for June 21"
- Previous message: Mike Flugennock: "Re: generational markers (was "Disney's Man In Space")"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Next in thread: Charleston: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Charleston: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Scott Hedrick: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Jun 2004 23:02:02 -0700
derekl1963@nospamyahoo.com (Derek Lyons) wrote in message news:<40bfb8bc.9984399@supernews.seanet.com>...
> hpywife927@yahoo.com (LaDonna Wyss) wrote:
> >First, I am not going to post Gus Grissom's autopsy report on the
> >Internet. I wouldn't even DREAM of asking Betty Grissom's permission
> >to do such a thing. Second, my medical credentials have nothing to do
> >with it.
>
> They certainly do when you make medical statement with such certainty.
>
> >Scott had that report examined by a top forensic
> >pathologist; you should ask for HIS credentials.
>
> We have done so on multiple occasions. scott has refused to supply
> them. (The credentials of said pathologist are far from the only
> thing he has refused to supply. He has openly admitted to concealing
> evidence.)
>
> D.
OK, THAT is one he** of a serious allegation, and I am not going to
allow it to stand. Scott is not "concealing evidence." There are
things that occur during the course of an investigation which, if
revealed at the wrong time in the wrong forum, can and do compromise
the investigation. That is NOT the same thing as concealing evidence.
Let's make certain you have that straight.
As for Scott "refusing" to supply the pathologist's credentials: I've
come to know him rather well over the past 18 months. What you
interpret as refusal is most likely Scott's propensity to forget
things. He is NOT attentive to detail. When he is deluged (such as I
have been just now with 14 postings all at once) he tends to become
overwhelmed and skips over most, if not all, of what he is being
asked. Again, perhaps a personal flaw, but not indicative he is
hiding anything. I will see about the credentials when I ask him to
tell me the pathologist's name again. If Scott is too busy flying,
I'll do my own credential search on the Internet and get it to you
that way.
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: SS1 flight set for June 21"
- Previous message: Mike Flugennock: "Re: generational markers (was "Disney's Man In Space")"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Next in thread: Charleston: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Charleston: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Scott Hedrick: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|