Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom

From: Pat Flannery (flanner_at_daktel.com)
Date: 06/04/04 

Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 02:05:43 -0500

LaDonna Wyss wrote:

>OK. Let's start with the last one first. I am FAR too busy with this
>to "google the group" for the past year or so. If you have a specific
>post from Jay Windley you would like me to address, feel free to
>direct me to it.
>

They were all pretty much the same when it came to scott and Jay; pick
any of them....

> I don't have time to waste searching through months
>of chatter to find the nugget or two worthy of response.
>

Well, scott calls Jay "windy" instead of Windley...that was about the
entire amusement value of both their endless postings.
They both now reside in my Phantom Zone, where all the posters whose
postings threaten to make me fall asleep go.

>Next, why do you have "Scott" in quotes? It's not a fictional name;
>it's his real name.
>

There's more "Scott"s around here; but only one "scott"- lower case
first letter.

> And I've already said that Scott is not great at
>explaining things.
>

Especially not to Jay Windley- take my word on that one.

> He assumes a certain level of knowledge and has NO
>patience for taking things to fundamental elements to catch people up.
>

Yeah....right....

> That is a weakness of his, but it does not prove lack of
>credibility...simply impatience.
>

He went to the Phantom Zone about the time I lost patience with his lack
of credibility.

>Next, I am not a "conspiratorial loon." I approached this with
>extreme skepticism, as did many members of my team.
>

OH GOD! Tell me it's not the Judica-Cordiglia brothers...anything but that!

> The fact is the
>evidence proves Scott's assertions to be true, and if you spent any
>time reviewing that evidence rather than lodging superficial attacks
>you might come to realize you are seriously mistaken.
>Finally, Scott didn't prove ANYTHING to me. I repeat: SCOTT did NOT
>prove ANYTHING to me. I spent 18 months compiling evidence from all
>over the country and determined ON MY OWN Apollo One was sabotaged.
>

How can you determine it "on your own" when you also have "many members
of my team"?
You aren't counting household pets as members of your "team", are you?
You aren't...by any chance...using cute, personality-filled _monkeys_ to
do this research for you, are you?
Because if _that's_ the case Missy, then I have only one thing to say to
you: "Where's the best place on the web to buy Purina Monkey Chow?!"

>
>The evidence speaks for itself.
>

Oo-kay; let's see the evidence... we're waiting....as is the Phantom
Zone....AND THE ELECTRIC MONKEY PROD !! >:o

Pat

Relevant Pages

  • Re: must be a FAQ, gcl and saved_gcl not found
    ... Jay G. Scott wrote: ... fat_string.c:229: warning: return type defaults to `int' ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: My thoughts on the Terry Schiavo case
    ... Jay Vance wrote: ... > all the years the parents have had to make their accusations against Michael ... there still is no evidence to support these accusations. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: setting up a dhcp client; primary interface?
    ... >Jay G. Scott wrote: ... >> i have a dhcp server, and i want to test it. ... i have a solaris 8 box ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: Farewell, Tomcat
    ... > That's a pretty extreme statement, Jay. ... > And since you didn't include "IMHO," what evidence can you offer? ... than this period, thanks to "that movie, 'Top Gun.'" ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Solaris 10 expected in jan 2005, true?
    ... On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Jay G. Scott wrote: ... I think Sun have publically ... Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, author of "Solaris Systems Programming" ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)