Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom

From: Derek Lyons (derekl1963_at_nospamyahoo.com)
Date: 06/04/04 

Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 15:01:57 GMT

hpywife927@yahoo.com (LaDonna Wyss) wrote:
>OK, THAT is one he** of a serious allegation,

It's not an allegation, it's a simple fact. scott openly admitted to
lying and concealing evidence.

>and I am not going to allow it to stand. Scott is not "concealing evidence."
>There are things that occur during the course of an investigation which, if
>revealed at the wrong time in the wrong forum, can and do compromise
>the investigation. That is NOT the same thing as concealing evidence.
> Let's make certain you have that straight.

Which is why scott lied, both to us, and to people reading his
website, about the existence of a report analyzing the piece of metal
alleged to be the cause of the hypothesized short. (snort)

*That* is concealing evidence.

>As for Scott "refusing" to supply the pathologist's credentials: I've
>come to know him rather well over the past 18 months. What you
>interpret as refusal is most likely Scott's propensity to forget
>things.

He's been asked multiple times over the past years. Dodging the
answer once is forgetting something. Failing repeatedly to answer a
repeated question is a very different matter.

>Again, perhaps a personal flaw, but not indicative he is
>hiding anything.

Lass, scott has openly admitted to concealing evidence. He stands
convicted on his own testimony.

D. 

-- 
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
Quantcast