Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom
From: LaDonna Wyss (hpywife927_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/09/04
- Next message: LaDonna Wyss: "Re: LaDonna Wyss, Poster Child for Troll Euthanasia (was: Some Bogus Plea for HELP Re: Apollo One)"
- Previous message: LaDonna Wyss: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom <- WARNING! TROLL! Probably"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply:(deleted message) rk: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: OM: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply:(deleted message) Bruce Palmer: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Scott Hedrick: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Jun 2004 22:53:54 -0700
derekl1963@nospamyahoo.com (Derek Lyons) wrote in message news:<40c67186.38728375@supernews.seanet.com>...
> hpywife927@yahoo.com (LaDonna Wyss) wrote:
> >That's exactly my point. Yes, this was a "hard short", but you have
> >to take into consideration its existence long before the test started
> >that afternoon. When the test did start, everytime the crew powered
> >up a system on the same bus that system exhibited problems.
>
> I have described a scenario consistent with the evidence (cable faults
> and equipment malfunctions and no evidence of a standing change), in
> my third paragraph, to which the other two were background. Your
> scenario is not consistent with this evidence.
>
> You are ignoring is that the same problems can also be caused by the
> known faults in the capsule cabling. You are also ignoring the fact
> that none of the behavior that would occur in the presence of a hard
> short seemed to have occurred.
>
> >So what you are describing here is exactly what I have been talking
> >about.
>
> My post has nothing whatsoever to do with your theory, but lays out
> the evidence that it is all but impossible. Your theory is not
> consistent with how electronic or electrical systems work.
>
> D.
If you say so. Unfortunately, numerous electricians, technicians, and
engineers disagree with you.
- Next message: LaDonna Wyss: "Re: LaDonna Wyss, Poster Child for Troll Euthanasia (was: Some Bogus Plea for HELP Re: Apollo One)"
- Previous message: LaDonna Wyss: "Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom <- WARNING! TROLL! Probably"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply:(deleted message) rk: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: OM: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply:(deleted message) Bruce Palmer: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Reply: Scott Hedrick: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|