Re: troll (assumed) responses
From: Scott Hedrick (dinehnm_at_KILLALLSPAMMERSyahoo.com)
Date: 06/09/04
- Next message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Previous message: Alan Erskine: "Re: Self control is troll control (Was Re: LaDonna Wyss ..."
- In reply to: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: troll (assumed) responses"
- Next in thread: OM: "Re: troll (assumed) responses"
- Reply: OM: "Re: troll (assumed) responses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:47:44 -0400
"Herb Schaltegger" <herbschaltegger@spamtrap.invalid> wrote in message
news:herbschaltegger-A9F534.20204308062004@news.newsguy.com...
> So, LaDonna, if you actually understood anything technical rather than
> parroting the big words someone has been feeding you, you'd realize just
> how wrong your conclusions are.
Wanna bet she comes back with something equivalent to "neener neener neener,
you're wrong!"
- Next message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: IS: Follow the Current - WAS: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom"
- Previous message: Alan Erskine: "Re: Self control is troll control (Was Re: LaDonna Wyss ..."
- In reply to: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: troll (assumed) responses"
- Next in thread: OM: "Re: troll (assumed) responses"
- Reply: OM: "Re: troll (assumed) responses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
