Re: troll (assumed) responses

From: Steve at fivetrees (steve_at_NOSPAMTAfivetrees.com)
Date: 06/10/04 

Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:46:43 +0100

"Andrew Gray" <andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk> wrote in message
news:slrnccf89q.7j8.andrew.gray@compsoc.dur.ac.uk...
> On 2004-06-09, Daniel Eig <dtolman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Come to think of it, during previous conspiracy loony go-arounds, the
> > most fascinating obscure tidbits have come out. I guess those sort of
> > things may never have happened without the catalyst.
>
> Isn't that why we all read ssh?

Indeed. But, OTOH, I could do without the flamefests [1].

[1] Speaking purely personally, of course. But this is the only newsgroup I
frequent that still suffers from them. All the others, mostly technical
and/or musical [2], have learnt how to avoid them, work around them. That's
not to say they're tame - far from it - that's half the value of usenet! -
but it does make life more pleasant.

[2] *The* most civilised newsgroup I know is a UK music group - i.e. no
Americans. I wonder if this is significant ;).

Steve
(g,d&r)
http://www.fivetrees.com