Re: Apollo 1 Documentation

From: LaDonna Wyss (hpywife927_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/13/04 

Date: 13 Jun 2004 15:03:20 -0700

"Charleston" <charleston1@coxthedotgoeshere.net> wrote in message news:<Wi1zc.26555$fZ1.14062@fed1read03>...
> "rk" <stellare@NOSPAMPLEASE.erols.com> wrote:
> > I marked this one as OT for "On-Topic" ;-)
> >
> > Anyways, semi-related to the current nonsense is historical documentation.
> So
> > I did some www searching for material and a few items popped up ...
> >
> > "The Apollo 204 Accident," John L. Walker, 1980. This is a research paper
> of
> > some sort. Has anyone read it? If so, worth reading?
>
> I have not seen it.
> >
> > A congressional report was mentioned. What was the exact title, document
> > number, date of publication? Specific page numbers were called out which
> > seemed to have relevant OT (on-topic) information. I found three things
> > searching some open electronic libraries; only references though, not
> > digitized reports.
> >
> > "Apollo 204 accident. Report of the committee with additional
> > views." 1968, United States Congress. 90:2. Senate Report no.
> > 956, Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences.
>
> I have not seen this one. I will look for it at my Federal Library.
>
> > "Apollo accident. Hearings before the Committee. 1967-68.,
> > United States Congress. 90-1. Senate Committee on Aeronautical
> > and Space Sciences. General Note: Two-volume report entitled:
> > Status of actions taken on the Apollo 204 Review Board Report.
>
> I don't think I have seen this Senate Report. It would be worth a look.
>
> > "Investigation into Apollo 204 accident. Hearings before the
> > Subcommittee on NASA oversight," Hearings held Apr. 10, 11, 12,
> > 17, 21. May 10, 1967.
>
> I have parts of this one. The documents referenced above are parts of the
> 3,500 page Congressional report in multiple volumes.
>
> > Is one of these that report?
>
> Yes, as noted above.
>
> > Or is it some other document that I didn't find
> > with a www search yet? Perhaps it was mentioned but the S/N ratio may
> have
> > contributed to my missing any proper references.
>
> Hang on. I am just about done as promised with several pages of the report
> and will have them on my website today.
>
> > Lastly, if there is something urgent that someone wants from the archives
> (I'm
> > in Maryland, not far from DC and other repositories) I can fetch and post
> it,
> > time permitting (rather busy at day job right now so no promises).
>
> The entire TPS 068 would be nice.
>
> Daniel

Good luck "fetch"ing it. There are no boxes marked "TPS Sheets." You
might start with the 50 boxes marked "Impounded Records", but those
TPS's are scattered throughout all 453 boxes of evidence. (Another
good place would be the series of Panel 8 "Integration Analysis.")
LaDonna