Re: LiOh Canisters: Especially for Herb

From: LaDonna Wyss (hpywife927_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/26/04 

Date: 26 Jun 2004 05:48:41 -0700

Herb Schaltegger <herbschaltegger@spamtrap.invalid> wrote in message news:<herbschaltegger-EFDC60.23043825062004@news.newsguy.com>...
> In article <0g3Dc.6$Yu.4@fed1read04>,
> "Charleston" <charleston1@coxthedotgoeshere.net> wrote:
>
> > "LaDonna Wyss" <hpywife927@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Herb, I really should NOT be doing this, because it's an insult to
> > > those who used five seconds to think about the importance of analyzing
> > > those canisters, but I've decided to indulge you and explain it one
> > > more time. The lithium hydroxide canisters (scrubbers) were supposed
> > > to be sent to Marshall for analysis. As I've told you before,
> > > Moonport incorrectly reports they WERE sent on March 8, 1967. In
> > > fact, NASA was SUPPOSED to send them for analysis, but the order to do
> > > so was CANCELLED.
> > > Why? Well, let's look at NASA's testimony before Congress. You see,
> > > by NOT analyzing the scrubbers, they could truthfully tell Congress,
> > > "Gee, we don't know WHAT the crew was breathing,"
> >
> > I thought you read the autopsy reports in their entirety. I won't repeat
> > myself too much except to restate that the crew themselves were the best
> > evidence of what they were exposed to, not some cannisters, nestled below
> > them. As you know the chemical work-up on the crew was fairly extensive and
> > speaks for itself.
> >
> > <large snip of well trodden territory removed>
> >
> > <side-track removed>
> >
> > Daniel
>
> If "LaDonna" was a truly experienced investigator, she'd remember that I
> had about six or eight specific things I asked concerning the testing
> she alleged should have been done. She has yet to address a single one.
> As I pointed out, and as you (Daniel) agreed, the condition of the
> spacecraft and the human remains spoke volumes; ergo, what does
> "LaDonna" believe would be or would have been added to the information
> available had such testing been performed? THAT question as well has
> never been answered.

Actually, Daniel, the questions on exactly what the crew was breathing
and how long it took the levels of carbon monoxide to build to a
lethal dose have always been in question. You've got the Hearings in
front of you--at least three of them. Do you not have Volume 1? Read
it! Everyone shrugs his shoulders and says, "We don't know WHAT the
crew was breathing; the cabin air was never analyzed." The only
person who went out on a limb was Berry, and he proved himself to be
an idiot when he made the ridiculous assertion that men could drop
dead in five seconds--and when someone undoubtedly tapped him on the
shoulder in the hallway that afternoon, he came back in the evening
session and completely changed his testimony.
Herb, as for what you may or may not have asked, who would know given
the fact that 95% of your posts are some sort of love session with OM,
or Hedrick, or someone else of that ilk?
I don't know what questions you might have; it seems rather simple to
me...you have the LiOH canisters, you have the opportunity to send
them out for testing, you SEND THEM OUT FOR TESTING. Sheesh, Herb, do
you realize they even had the crew log books sent for chemical
analysis? Well, I thought they already knew everything about this
fire--what's with the chemical analysis? Afraid someone sprayed
gasoline around the cockpit before the crew entered and it went
undetected until the fire? So, why not test the scrubbers?
Yes, I've seen the autopsy report, but the scrubbers tell the story of
TIME, something you would realize if you thought about it for a
minute. The question of TIME has never been answered other than by
third-party experts. The scrubbers could have ended the question
before it ever began.
LaDonna

Quantcast