Re: LiOh Canisters: Especially for Herb

From: LaDonna Wyss (hpywife927_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/27/04 

Date: 27 Jun 2004 08:09:01 -0700

Herb Schaltegger <herbschaltegger@spamtrap.invalid> wrote in message news:<herbschaltegger-B86297.22055826062004@news.newsguy.com>...
> In article <IooDc.2615$hd1.793@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
> "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@KILLALLSPAMMERSyahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > "LaDonna Wyss" <hpywife927@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:4821518f.0406260448.1470859c@posting.google.com...
> > You've got the Hearings in
> > > front of you--at least three of them. Do you not have Volume 1? Read
> > > it!
> >
> > Please cite a specific page, unless you are claiming that the contents of
> > the cabin air is the *entirety* of volume one. Are there "102 pages of
> > testimony" on the subject of the cabin air as well?
> >
> > > Herb, as for what you may or may not have asked, who would know
> >
> > Anyone who read his posts, of course. Perhaps you should try that before
> > replying in the future. Better still, *answer* his questions.
> >
> > given
> > > the fact that 95% of your posts are some sort of love session
> >
> > Herb, she's after you now! Say this carefully and under oath: "I did not
> > have sex with that woman!"
> >
> > Afraid someone sprayed
> > > gasoline around the cockpit before the crew entered and it went
> > > undetected until the fire?
> >
> > Please provide some verifiable evidence, liar.
>
> She's a narcissistic, attention-seeking fruit loop of the highest order.
> I expect nothing of her except further misinterpreted "evidence" and a
> great many more outright fabrications of the sort she's already proven
> herself guilty of - to with, her claim that I sent an email to her, a
> claim she now seems content to pretend never happened, the lying,
> slanderous troll.
>
> I'm also still waiting for: the names of her "teammates", the name of
> "scott's" pathologist, her responses to rk's specific questions, her
> responses to Michael Gardner's comments, her explanation of how a "hard
> short" of the sort she and "scott" claim occurred could trigger a fire
> in a de-engergized RCS thruster quad in the SM which could then smolder
> unnoticed for 22-odd minutes with all the SM GSE panels open, yet burn
> around the circumference of the SM and be energetic enough to burn
> through the base heat shield and aft bulkhead of the CM.

Boy, Herb, you put almost as many words in my mouth as Hedrick! I
never said the fire burned around the circumference of the SM. I've
also never said the RCS thruster quad was de-energized--I don't
believe it was, and the evidence doesn't demonstrate that it was. As
for the list of teammates, I've addressed this ad nauseum. Also,
Scott's pathologist is no longer an issue because he has his expert,
and now I have mine who concurs with Scott's. I'm still waiting for
RK to email me on his questions I apparently missed (RK, I need you to
email me anyway because I'm not getting through to your email anyway
and I have something personal to tell you--you should know the subject
matter.) And, the fire did not burn through the base heat shield; it
travelled up the umbilical and from there burned it's way around the
ablative shield between the pressure vessel and the shield. If you
looked at the photographs you would be able to see the fire path plain
as day.
LaDonna