Re: Apollo 1/204 Service Module RCS quad access panels Was: Pyro Relays vs. Isolation Valves
From: rk (stellare_at_NOSPAMPLEASE.erols.com)
Date: 07/05/04
- Next message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: Problem with Apollo "murder" claims"
- Previous message: Paul Blay: "Re: Electrical Load Simulators - stop emailing me bozo"
- In reply to: Charleston: "Apollo 1/204 Service Module RCS quad access panels Was: Pyro Relays vs. Isolation Valves"
- Next in thread: Charleston: "Re: Apollo 1/204 Service Module RCS quad access panels Was: Pyro Relays vs. Isolation Valves"
- Reply: Charleston: "Re: Apollo 1/204 Service Module RCS quad access panels Was: Pyro Relays vs. Isolation Valves"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 05 Jul 2004 11:24:45 GMT
Charleston wrote:
> <hpywife927@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ Snip Discussion of panels with picture references ]
It is interesting [and to work in a bit of actual space history and
engineering] to note that the mechanical design of the panels implemented
lessons learned from previous manned missions.
The quad concept employed on the SM is an advanced stage of
modularization and has simplified manufacturing, checkout, and
servicing as well as the replacement of components. In Project
Mercury, it was difficult to replace even a single valve on the
RCS. On the SM, the entire panel is removed and replaced with a
spare panel. The panel requiring replacement of a component is
returned to the factory for repair. With this approach, the SM
RCS can be completely manufactured and check out independently
of the other subsystems.
Source:
"Apollo Reaction Control Systems"
Chester A. Vaughan, Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston Texas
Paper No. 68-566
AIAA 4th Propulsion Joint Specialist Conference
Cleveland, Ohio
[ snip ]
> scroll down to witness statements, select your
> favorite format, and search on "quad".
>
> WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER
>
> "At this time, I saw the fire; and there was fire inside the Service
> Module or it appeared to be inside the Service Module. I could see it
> through the open doors - the open quad doors. Someone at this time
> hollered that we had to get the fire out or else the LES would go; and
> another man and myself, Space-craft inspector, got a fire extinguisher
> and started playing it inside the door of the Service Module. When this
> fire extinguisher ran out, I left Level 7, took the stairs down to Level
> 6 and got another fire extinguisher on Level 6, came back up to Level 7
> and by this time, the fire seemed to be in pretty good control on Level
> 7."
Note that the Project Manager for Skylab was William C. Schneider; this is
William J.
>> There are a lot of factors
>> involved in where a fire will travel once lit.
>> HOWEVER, there is more than one witness statement that talks about a
>> cable being on fire--remember, Daniel?
>
> *if you were inside the Command Module at
> the time of the fire when the pressure vessel failed,
> it would be roughly equivalent to being inside
> an automobile tire blowout as far as air pressure
> changes go. This would not be good for small and delicate
> blood vessels in your lungs. Nor would it be nice for family
> members to hear about pulmonary compression,
> rapid pulmonary decompression, pulmonary hemorrhagic
> edema, cyanide gas at fatal levels, all on top of the fact
> that your loved one suffered through a horrible toxic fire.
>
> Daniel
> Thank God I am off work today.
It is, of course, not nice for anyone to hear and on this weekend (USA
context) it's a good reminder [better word?] to treat the death of those who
sacrificied, and their survivors, with proper respect.
-- rk, Just an OldEngineer "Dealing properly with very rare events is one of the attributes that distinguishes a design that is fit for safety-critical systems from one that is not." -- John Rushby in "A Comparison of Bus Architectures for Safety- Critical Embedded Systems," March 2003
- Next message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: Problem with Apollo "murder" claims"
- Previous message: Paul Blay: "Re: Electrical Load Simulators - stop emailing me bozo"
- In reply to: Charleston: "Apollo 1/204 Service Module RCS quad access panels Was: Pyro Relays vs. Isolation Valves"
- Next in thread: Charleston: "Re: Apollo 1/204 Service Module RCS quad access panels Was: Pyro Relays vs. Isolation Valves"
- Reply: Charleston: "Re: Apollo 1/204 Service Module RCS quad access panels Was: Pyro Relays vs. Isolation Valves"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|