Re: OT: errors in Moore's film
From: Dave O'Neill (_at_)
Date: 07/24/04
- Next message: Monte Davis: "Re: Saturn 5"
- Previous message: Dave O'Neill: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- Reply: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:25:23 GMT
"Rand Simberg" <newsgroups@transterrestrial.com> wrote in message
news:81aMc.10854$mL5.6304@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Dave O'Neill wrote:
>
> >>>>>Not particuarly, but I'm pointing out the absurdity of claiming that
> >>>>>practically everybody who disagrees with you has some kind of
comprehension
> >>>>>difficulty.
> >>>>
> >>>>Then you once again demonstrate your inability to comprehend English,
> >>>>since you point out the absurdity of something that I've never done.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>We've already had this thread, there are huge numbers of people on
> >>>this news group who struggle with your English, even people you like
> >>>and who often agree with you.
> >>
> >>"Huge" numbers? Please.
> >>
> >>And please give me more than one example of the latter (I'm not sure you
> >>that you can come up with even one).
> >
> >
> > Pat Flannery, recently Herb, myself, Sander, Eric (naturally), Hop
> > David (on occasion) and I'm sure I've left some out. I'm pretty sure
> > that Paul Blay has "misnderstood" you too.
>
> I'll give you Herb. I don't have any recollection about Paul. The rest
> often disagree with me. And even if I were to grant you all of those,
> it's hardly a "huge" number, unless in your language, "huge" means
> miniscule.
It's more than "one"
Or was I misunderstanding the following too?
"(I'm not sure you that you can come up with even one)."
- Next message: Monte Davis: "Re: Saturn 5"
- Previous message: Dave O'Neill: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- Reply: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: errors in Moore's film"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
