Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years
From: Paul Blay (ranma_at_saotome.demon.co.uk)
Date: 08/02/04
- Next message: Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker (zili_at_home): "Re: The Mad Scientists Club- formerly Re: [FWD] Whoops! Wrong stealth pic in previous post!"
- Previous message: William C. Keel: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- In reply to: William C. Keel: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Next in thread: Peter Munn: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:05:19 +0100
"William C. Keel" wrote ...
>
> "If it's not weird, it's not quantum". With wavefunction collapse,
> you could identify individual photons at the reflector, but only
> if you (say) detected some, thereby destroying them.
... unless you believe this guy.
http://www.kathryncramer.com/wblog/archives/000530.html
- Next message: Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker (zili_at_home): "Re: The Mad Scientists Club- formerly Re: [FWD] Whoops! Wrong stealth pic in previous post!"
- Previous message: William C. Keel: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- In reply to: William C. Keel: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Next in thread: Peter Munn: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
