Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?
From: John Stoffel (stoffel_at_lucent.com)
Date: 08/05/04
- Next message: MattWriter: "Re: The First Space Race is finally out"
- Previous message: John Stoffel: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Next in thread: Henry Spencer: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Reply: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 10:33:33 -0400
henry@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer) writes:
> (c) the program is a random grab-bag of missions, with no continuity in
> targets or engineering, so the incentive is to get maximum return out of a
> unique flight opportunity, rather than to ensure that the first one works
> so the experience can be used to improve the second and third.
I though that DS-1 (and some of the others) were primarily engineering
missions that were designed to validate and push into general use new
technologies. Isnt' that part of the discovery missions goals?
John
- Next message: MattWriter: "Re: The First Space Race is finally out"
- Previous message: John Stoffel: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Next in thread: Henry Spencer: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Reply: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: Messenger - long way to Mercury?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]