Re: DO we really need a new manned launcher?
From: OM (om_at_our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research_facility.org)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: RobertMaas_at_YahooGroups.Com: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: OT: Re: MOST (was Re: Zodiacal light linked to ancient Martian oceans)"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: DO we really need a new manned launcher?"
- Next in thread: Ami Silberman: "Re: DO we really need a new manned launcher?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 19:45:22 -0500
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:09:47 GMT, fairwater@gmail.com (Derek Lyons)
wrote:
><nods> And it also occurs to me that he once again makes a contrary
>statement, to wit: That a 'time tested' design should be
>'customized', and this will not impact the time to availability.
...Depends on the customization. Shouldn't take too long to let the
racing colors dry, although I could see some R&D issues on the MOPAR
stickers and how to get them to stick without outgassing off the hull.
OM
-- "No *** ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb *** die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr
- Next message: RobertMaas_at_YahooGroups.Com: "Re: Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: OT: Re: MOST (was Re: Zodiacal light linked to ancient Martian oceans)"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: DO we really need a new manned launcher?"
- Next in thread: Ami Silberman: "Re: DO we really need a new manned launcher?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]