Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents
From: Steve Wachowski (swachowski_at_cfl.rr.com)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: nelson family: "Re: Cape Canaveral"
- Previous message: Aussiesuffer3788: "Re: Genesis: a dumb question"
- In reply to: Scott M. Kozel: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Next in thread: Scott M. Kozel: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Reply: Scott M. Kozel: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:00:40 GMT
"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:4142FAEF.87E15873@attbi.com...
> This is from 1998, and shows the entire complex. The little road
> heading to the left from the transporter road about midway between the
> VAB and the pads, would have been the location of the transporter road
> heading to Pad 39C near the left edge of the photo --
> http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/photos/nasa/aerial/aerial05.htm
No, actually the turn to Pad 39C is along the existing crawlerway leading to
39B. The provisions for it are still there today. This is a Terraserver shot
of the crawlerway, you can see the dead end:
http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?t=1&s=13&x=335&y=1977&z=17&w=1
Steve Wachowski
- Next message: nelson family: "Re: Cape Canaveral"
- Previous message: Aussiesuffer3788: "Re: Genesis: a dumb question"
- In reply to: Scott M. Kozel: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Next in thread: Scott M. Kozel: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Reply: Scott M. Kozel: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
