Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents
From: Scott M. Kozel (kozelsm_at_attbi.com)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: james_anatidae: "Re: Early VAB design that could have held six Saturn Vs?"
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- In reply to: Steve Wachowski: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Next in thread: Rusty Barton: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:12:54 -0400
"Steve Wachowski" <swachowski@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>
> "Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@attbi.com> wrote:
>
> > This is from 1998, and shows the entire complex. The little road
> > heading to the left from the transporter road about midway between the
> > VAB and the pads, would have been the location of the transporter road
> > heading to Pad 39C near the left edge of the photo --
> > http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/photos/nasa/aerial/aerial05.htm
>
> No, actually the turn to Pad 39C is along the existing crawlerway leading to
> 39B. The provisions for it are still there today. This is a Terraserver shot
> of the crawlerway, you can see the dead end:
>
> http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?t=1&s=13&x=335&y=1977&z=17&w=1
I got it corrected in my 6:49 PM post with the following --
This must be it here... the transporter road that goes off the right
edge of the image --
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/misc/apmisc-launch-art.jpg
- Next message: james_anatidae: "Re: Early VAB design that could have held six Saturn Vs?"
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- In reply to: Steve Wachowski: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Next in thread: Rusty Barton: "Re: VAB suffers some damage -- threat to contents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
