Re: Rand Simberg's excellent article is long

From: OM (om_at_our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research_facility.org)
Date: 09/12/04 

Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:27:20 -0500

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:46:01 -0500, "Christopher M. Jones"
<christopher.m.jones@gmail.com> wrote:

>Precisely. How is it that you deserve the benefit of
>the doubt on racism when discussing, humorously, the
>use of firehouses against civil rights protestors yet
>Rand Simberg does not receive any similar benefit?

...Because Rand is an egotistical prick who actually means the drivel
he foists on his readers, while Pat is being satirical about a topic
that *does* deserve to be made fun of.

It's the intent here, not the context, that should be judged.

                                OM 

-- 
"No *** ever won a war by dying for     | http://www.io.com/~o_m
 his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
 poor dumb *** die for his country."    | Human O-Ring Society
 
	- General George S. Patton, Jr
Quantcast