Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing
From: Derek Lyons (fairwater_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: Spaceship One - It wasn't wind sheer"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- In reply to: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Next in thread: Andre Lieven: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Reply: Andre Lieven: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Reply: Jeff Findley: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Reply: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:30:19 GMT
Kevin Willoughby <KevinWilloughby@acm.org.invalid> wrote:
>In article <4168aa8a.30107465@supernews.seanet.com>, fairwater@gmail.com
>says...
>> Of course *your* tired arguments ignore the fact that neither SS1 nor
>> DC-X is/was an operational spacecraft with a useful mission.
>
>Winning $10,000,000.00 sounds like a useful mission to me, even it is
>with an experimental aerospacecraft.
A net win of -$10,000,000.00 is useful?
D.
-- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: Spaceship One - It wasn't wind sheer"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- In reply to: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Next in thread: Andre Lieven: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Reply: Andre Lieven: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Reply: Jeff Findley: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Reply: Kevin Willoughby: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
