Re: spy satellite we have to
From: Revision (kentnobettsspam_at_techispdotcom)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Previous message: Craig Fink: "Re: SS1 -- one down, one to go!"
- In reply to: XDFTYLM: "spy satellite we have to"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 06:39:50 -0500
"XDFTYLM"
xenophobic defective....fucking timewaste, you little maggot.
Slow day there in Hootin' Holler? Use spellcheck.
You assume that publishing the orbit of a spy satellite would somehow
make the use of an SR-71 a desirable option. You sort of skipped over a
lot of ground. I would ask you to explain, but it would be pointless.
> Sure would like to take a surprise peek in the desserts of
> Afghanistan(?) these days.
Boy howdy.....yesiree bob.....dad married his sister.
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Previous message: Craig Fink: "Re: SS1 -- one down, one to go!"
- In reply to: XDFTYLM: "spy satellite we have to"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
