Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing
From: Paul F. Dietz (dietz_at_dls.net)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Previous message: Revision: "Re: spy satellite we have to"
- In reply to: OM: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:18:00 -0500
OM wrote:
> ...Note that every single one of his "experts" were also notoriously
> against manned space exploration.
How convenient. Anyone who reached the conclusion you didn't like
at talked about it were 'notorious', hence suspect.
> Mondale would have been an even
> bigger idiot than he was - and still is - to have accepted data from
> pro-NASA real experts, unless he adjusted the data to fit his sick
> agenda.
Of course that would have been foolish! NASA and its experts had
a very strong motivation to distort and lie, since they were facing the
end of their agency, careers, and perhaps even their professions.
What's puzzling is why the lies were accepted, and why some sad
individuals continue to try to defend them.
Paul
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Previous message: Revision: "Re: spy satellite we have to"
- In reply to: OM: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Manned space flight after the moon landing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
