Re: Version of the Atlas II with no sustainer?
From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: dave: "Re: The City Of Melbourne Will Be Safe Tonight"
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Why Stafford before Armstrong?"
- Next in thread: Pat Flannery: "Re: Version of the Atlas II with no sustainer?"
- Reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: Version of the Atlas II with no sustainer?"
- Maybe reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: Version of the Atlas II with no sustainer?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:30:04 GMT
In article <10l24275cen5j12@corp.supernews.com>,
Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> wrote:
>http://www.geocities.com/atlas_missile/other_missions.htm
>Is that supposed to be a four-engined variant of the Centaur on the
>Atlas Cargo Vehicle? Or has somebody started clustering Agena motors?
The first Centaur concept had four engines. Engine size and number varied
somewhat during the early design work.
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@spsystems.net
- Next message: dave: "Re: The City Of Melbourne Will Be Safe Tonight"
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Why Stafford before Armstrong?"
- Next in thread: Pat Flannery: "Re: Version of the Atlas II with no sustainer?"
- Reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: Version of the Atlas II with no sustainer?"
- Maybe reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: Version of the Atlas II with no sustainer?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]