Re: ISS vs Skylab
From: Derek Lyons (fairwater_at_gmail.com)
Date: 12/10/04
- Next message: Derek Lyons: "Re: mistakes (was Re: Aerospace Projects Review updates)"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Felxibility of Apollo design (was Re: Space station future adrift (Soyuz purchase crisis) )"
- In reply to: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: ISS vs Skylab"
- Next in thread: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: ISS vs Skylab"
- Reply: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: ISS vs Skylab"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:37:54 GMT
Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>In article <41bce50f.5290784@supernews.seanet.com>,
> fairwater@gmail.com (Derek Lyons) wrote:
>
>> Designing for maintenance means being able to get at things, and move
>> them about. It means providing for isolation and bypasses. It means
>> proper spares, tools, stowage, etc..
>
>I know exactly what you mean - I don't want to write a gigantic essay
>on the issue;
When you can leave off constant sniping off topic, I'd appreciate it
if you'd consider devoting the same energy to this on topic topic.
D.
-- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
- Next message: Derek Lyons: "Re: mistakes (was Re: Aerospace Projects Review updates)"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Felxibility of Apollo design (was Re: Space station future adrift (Soyuz purchase crisis) )"
- In reply to: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: ISS vs Skylab"
- Next in thread: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: ISS vs Skylab"
- Reply: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: ISS vs Skylab"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|