Re: Sickening Discussion
qed100_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/04/05
- Next message: OM: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Jan 2005 21:23:33 -0800
Derek Lyons wrote:
> qed100@hotmail.com wrote:
> >This is entirely uncalled for. I'm not starting a fight. I'm
telling it
> >as I see it on a public forum,
>
> You are making ridiculous statements utterly unconnected to the
facts.
>
> >I insist now that you rebut each & every point I made...
>
> You haven't made any points, you've made pronouncements of your
> opinions diguised as facts.
You say that I've made an error, but won't say what it is. Sounds like
I've been placed under arrest by the secret police. So what is it you
think I've said which is incontrovertibly wrong?
-Mark Martin
- Next message: OM: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|