Re: Sickening Discussion
qed100_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/04/05
- Next message: Andre Lieven: "Re: AC & DC power sources in Apollo spacecraft"
- Previous message: pat: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Jan 2005 11:04:21 -0800
Derek Lyons wrote:
> qed100@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >So what is it you think I've said which is incontrovertibly wrong?
>
> Have you tried reading the replies that have been made to you
already?
Certainly, every one of them. And no one has demonstrated case-closed
that I'm unambiguously in error. And I must point out that you still
haven't rebutted my posts point for point. You have yet to make clear
precisely what I've said that cranked you off so badly. It'll do you no
good in my book to simply ASSERT that I've said nothing to rebut.
That's bull***, because if I've said nothing, then you'd have nothing
to complain about to begin with.
My guess is that you simply get a hard-on by dragging out this
behavior. You aren't gonna cough up a rebuttal no matter how long I
argue with you, and that is CRANK BEHAVIOR. So, put up or shut up,
crank.
-Mark Martin
- Next message: Andre Lieven: "Re: AC & DC power sources in Apollo spacecraft"
- Previous message: pat: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: Sickening Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]