Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing
From: OM (om_at_our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research_facility.org)
Date: 01/04/05
- Next message: OM: "Re: NASA Rovers' Adventures On Mars Continue"
- Previous message: Andre Lieven: "Re: Way OT: Asia Earthquake"
- In reply to: pat: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Next in thread: Neil Gerace: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Reply: Neil Gerace: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Reply: Ami Silberman: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:23:41 -0600
On 4 Jan 2005 10:42:03 -0800, "pat" <bahn@tgv-rockets.com> wrote:
>No guns, no missiles, pure flight simulation.
...To me, that equals a quick flight path to boredom, with stopovers
at tedium, drudgery, and a plane change at monotony. After all, what
good are flight sims if you can't escape into the sheer absurdity of
dogfights between 747s?
OM
-- "No *** ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb *** die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr
- Next message: OM: "Re: NASA Rovers' Adventures On Mars Continue"
- Previous message: Andre Lieven: "Re: Way OT: Asia Earthquake"
- In reply to: pat: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Next in thread: Neil Gerace: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Reply: Neil Gerace: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Reply: Ami Silberman: "Re: Number of engines, was: earliest moon landing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]