Re: Way OT: Asia Earthquake

From: D Schneider (snidelyd_at_netscape.com)
Date: 01/11/05 

Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:52:12 -0800

On 11 Jan 2005 18:08:05 GMT, Andre Lieven <dg411@FreeNet.Carleton.CA>
wrote:

>>>
>>> OK, so you're a tight pedant. Got it.
>>
>> No, you didn't...
>
> No proof offered ? Claim fails.

The proof is that you still show misunderstanding of my example.

My "tight pedant" post does to your quote what you did to RL's.

>
>> the inclusion following was the example; compare with the
>> following inclusion:
>>
>>> " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
>>> The Man Prayer, Red Green.
>>
>> It pushes *my* buttons when people deliberately misquote me. Perhaps RL
>> might also object?
>
> What the f#@* are you winging on about ?

Read what you did to RL's msg when you "quoted" her. Read what I did to
your quote in my earlier msg. Compare that to the excerpt above. Learn
reading skills.

>
> Oh, my quote of Ger Green is word for word accurate. The show is
> on twice a weekday up here, so I have plenty of opportunity to
> verify it. And, I have.

*Your* quote of RG may be accurate. Your quote of RL was not. I
demonstrated the same tatic by munging your quote in the earlier post.
When you didn't get it, I posted an accurate inclusion for your comparison.

It is blatant manipulation to deliberately misquote someone. You
deliberately misquoted RL.

/dps 

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Quantcast