Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus

From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/24/05 

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:25:59 +0000 (UTC)

Speaking about things that suck;
This time I'd much rather the "Bush Administration Kills Hubble Space
Telescope" than having that certified warlord moron running us amuck
after more of those stealth WMD. Of course, the necessary infrastructure
and their usual internal bogus accounting that would have sustained
and/or R&D upon replacement shuttles can now be quietly diverted into
the task of global energy domination. At least in this way we're not
publicly pissing off half the world by way of blowing everything in
sight, nor are we knowingly polluting mother Earth into another
fairlywell by having to launch yet another spendy and seriously
astronaut risky mission in order to polish those Hubble mirrors.

Bagging the likes of Hubble as well as for those pathetic Osprey V-22
fiasco death-trap flying machines will likely save or at least spare
countless lives and prevent absolute thousands of tonnes of artificial
CO2 pollution from impacting our global warming world, not to mention
allowing those billions of dollars/euros that can be better invested
along with their associated talents upon something that'll actually
matter to humanity. If you can't think of anything, I do believe that I
have a small list of a thousand or so better things to be doing with our
resources and supposed talents.

Perhaps instead of sustaining the likes of Hubble, ISS or Ospreys that
can't seem to manage a flight without getting someone or several killed,
possibly 10% of those funds and thus 10% of the talents associated
should go into the 'relocating ISS to the moon' or perhaps into the
required R&D of actually having to provide for the scientific community
with an actual fly-by-rocket lander (manned or robotic) that'll safely
deploy something/anything useful onto our moon, thereby without having
everything vaporised in the process.

At this point, it seem that our stash of conventional weapons are nearly
at the limits of inventory as well as deployment capability, and that
leaves us with the rather nasty prospects of using tactical and perhaps
not so tactical nuclear items against those insisting upon living in
spite of the fact that we want all of their oil, or at least we're
focused upon keeping the price of such oil so darn artificially high
that only the absolute wealthiest of nations need apply, whereas all
others can suck another egg, except I think we either want that egg as
well or, else we want that egg to cost a hundred dollars/euros.

Focusing upon our moon and the likes of Venus isn't all that
complicated, nor is there an ulterior motive that'll get more than half
the world upset. There's even a good chance that if other life is
contacted that such a discovery/opportunity would either heel the souls
of many, or it would become the ultimate divide that'll define the true
nature of individuals that have been hiding behind cold-war cloak and
dagger agendas. Either way it's a win-win for honest humanity.

Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm 

-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Space Policy Sucks, while theres Life on Venus
    ... Speaking about things that suck; ... This time I'd much rather the "Bush Administration Kills Hubble Space ... deploy something/anything useful onto our moon, ... others can suck another egg, except I think we either want that egg as ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Space Policy Sucks, while theres Life on Venus
    ... say what you will but the hubble has had an outstanding life and has ... > This time I'd much rather the "Bush Administration Kills Hubble Space ... > deploy something/anything useful onto our moon, ... > others can suck another egg, except I think we either want that egg as ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Space Policy Sucks, while theres Life on Venus
    ... say what you will but the hubble has had an outstanding life and has ... > This time I'd much rather the "Bush Administration Kills Hubble Space ... > deploy something/anything useful onto our moon, ... > others can suck another egg, except I think we either want that egg as ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
    ... never walked on the moon. ... We should be able to turn the Hubble telescope onto the moon landing ... Surely the Hubble Space Telescope could photograph the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT: The end of the world in roughly 3 hours
    ... moon rocks were rather useful, ... But going to the moon is expensive and we already have some ... look at how much science is coming from Spirit ... The volume of science from Hubble is embarrassingly huge. ...
    (comp.os.vms)