Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus
From: Captain! (SpammersMustDie_at_now.net)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: Technical and Spiritual Development"
- Previous message: Sam Seiber: "Re: music in outer space"
- In reply to: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:46:04 GMT
"Fred J. McCall" <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:oma6v0d0q0tjr9jdcg8r968km4lhhtch80@4ax.com...
> "Captain!" <SpammersMustDie@now.net> wrote:
>
> :now you're talking. no need for a human foot to ever set a print on that
> :hellhole. but i don't think we have anything at the present time that can
> :withstand the heat and pressure combo for very long.
>
> Then why bother sending anything at all?
because people are curious freddy. enjoy the golden age while we still have
it.
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: Technical and Spiritual Development"
- Previous message: Sam Seiber: "Re: music in outer space"
- In reply to: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
