Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus

From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/27/05 

Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:38:08 +0000 (UTC)

"Captain!" <SpammersMustDie@now.net> wrote in message
news:qLVJd.44371$Qb.41985@edtnps89

> say what you will but the hubble has had an outstanding life and has
> increased our appreciation of the beauty of deep field galaxies and
> knowledge of things like sedna. everything comes to an end i know but it
> doesn't mean i have to like it.
>
That's true, and the end is perhaps a bit too close and personal and
downright lethal for anyone that's been in the path of our resident
energy/blood-sucking warlord. Thus instead of having our global energy
situation reasonably under control, and thereby the trillion plus
dollars and euros better spent and/or available for the likes of Hubble
(actually it's several trillions if you'd care to honestly take this as
a global argument from the very get-go of those good old space-race
days, of the perpetrated cold-war fiasco of disinformation-R-us and
essentially up-yours that almost brought us into WW-III), instead we
haven't the resources nor willing talents as to sustain the likes of
Hubble, nor to accomplish so much other that should have been a done
deal as of decades ago.

BTW; I've offered to pay matching funds for the likes of sustaining
Hubble, and
that should have been sufficient to have made the difference, as money
always talks.

Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm 

-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG