Re: [OT] Navy releases photos of U.S.S. San Francisco
From: Neil Gerace (geracen_at_iinet.net.au)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: OM: "Re: ATTN: Scott Grissom - four specific questions"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: ATTN: Scott Grissom - four specific questions"
- Maybe in reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: [OT] Navy releases photos of U.S.S. San Francisco"
- Next in thread: Scott Hedrick: "Re: [OT] Navy releases photos of U.S.S. San Francisco"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:58:03 +0800
"Christopher M. Jones" <christopher.m.jones@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:boadnQbvb5StMWDcRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> It does
> seem odd, though, an undersea mount definitely falls into the
> class of things you'd think they could spot from a mile away.
At least they should have charts that can be trusted. A mountain (if that's
what it was) is not ordinarily something that's not there one day and then
there the next, like a (Japanese fishing) boat.
> Those boats are also pretty danged manouverable, it's hard to
> see how this sort of thing could have happened.
I bet it can't stop in its own length from its top speed, like an iron ore
train can :)
- Next message: OM: "Re: ATTN: Scott Grissom - four specific questions"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: ATTN: Scott Grissom - four specific questions"
- Maybe in reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: [OT] Navy releases photos of U.S.S. San Francisco"
- Next in thread: Scott Hedrick: "Re: [OT] Navy releases photos of U.S.S. San Francisco"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
