Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable
From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: Robert Conley: "Re: MA-8 FLight Plan questions."
- Previous message: Anthony Frost: "Re: Russia and ESA start to Mars and Venus again"
- In reply to: Stullia: "Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:47:36 +0000 (UTC)
Stullia; "The problem is: what's life. Can be life on the Sun? I think
there is. You are talking about possibility to survive of Earth forms on
Venus."
Give me a break. There are certain limits to applied physics, and the
solar surface isn't remotely within the ballpark of what's known to
physics and of any science that would stand a freaking chance in hell of
surviving the sun, and that's regardless of however smart and prepared
you are.
I'm only suggesting that it's worth giving it a shot upon Venus, that is
if your were not entirely snookered by whatever the mainstream media has
to say about Venus. With some reasonably applied technology is where
even a fairly pathetic village idiot of a human could make a tough go of
surviving upon Venus, although that's not as per any naked form of
survival, and I still wouldn't advise going there in person.
Look my friend. It sounds as though you know a little more than most of
us, thereby it's really not all that complicated unless you're going
blind as well as one of the dumb and dumber souls that'll gladly believe
in whatever the mainstream status quo wants you to believe about Venus.
Much like our perpetrated cold-war, Russia(USSR) did the very same
snookering by claiming to have those AI/robotic landers that oddly never
once went through any recorded R&D, and thereby having absolutely no
documentation of how well or poorly their lander was going to function.
It's all a bunch of incest mainstream dog-wagging spin, hype and
disinformation that was brought about by our mutually perpetrated
cold-war(s).
I'll totally agree that soft landings upon the moon need to be
accomplished, then perhaps a fully fly-by-rocket machine capable of
getting a few humans onto the lunar deck would be a good thing, except
for the TBI dosage factor of secondary hard-X-Rays, plus managing all of
the horrific factors of primary and secondary heat, and of being so
easily pulverised at any time goes without saying.
When I'm offering that Venus is doable, I'm into AI/robotic landers and
perhaps having a nice station-keeping robotic platform (TRACE-II) at
Venus L2, as I'm afraid that humans are simply too dumbfounded to ever
consider what an expedition would involve, much less having to deal
nicely with whomever is still alive and kicking on Venus, as they might
be Cathars or even Muslim.
BTW; can you relocate a copy of "The last view it send was an
cylindrical object reaching the craft."
I too believe that a planet such as Venus could become home base to any
number of ETs. I also remembered something about that nasty "cylindrical
object" but haven't any idea as to how to obtain a fresh copy of the
original image.
Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Robert Conley: "Re: MA-8 FLight Plan questions."
- Previous message: Anthony Frost: "Re: Russia and ESA start to Mars and Venus again"
- In reply to: Stullia: "Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|