Re: Moon hoax as American as apple pie

From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/06/05 

Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:40:06 +0000 (UTC)

"Ami A. Silberman" <silber@mitre.org> wrote in message
news:3F424172.81538A39@mitre.org

> >
> > | Too bad none of that works for the V-22 Osprey
> >
> > Apples and oranges.
> >
> And wrong, to boot. The Osprey has a fatal crash about once every
> thousand hours of flight (which is unacceptably high for an operational
> aircraft). The LM had maybe a total of ten hours of powered flight. If
> the LM crashed ten times as often as the Osprey, it still would have
> been unlikely to crash.

Sorry, but good try. You're still not being specific about those
fly-by-rocket landers.

No R&D documentation, especially nothing AI/robotic that worthy of any
demo on behalf of safely delivering a pizza off a 3 story building.

Forget our supposed manned landers; just focus upon those supposed
AI/robotic fly-by-rocket Russian landers that also can't be demonstrated
nor otherwise backed up with any documentation upon their R&D step by
step efforts.

Comparing aerodynamics to something that's entirely 3D fly-by-rocket
isn't even within the same ballpark.

You do realize exactly how darn hot and nasty the fully solar
illuminated lunar surface of such dark basalt is, don't you?

You do realize that the lunar surface is highly reactive, more so than
aluminum. Thus hard-X-Rays (at least a good 1e6 m2 worth) are being
created just about everywhere. Of course, wizard Jay of 'apollohoax'
knows for a fact that our sun isn't a resource of anything that's the
least bit nasty. In fact, according to the likes of wizard Jay, the
earthshine lunar environment is just as bad off if not much worse off
than by sunlight.

Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm 

-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG