Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no
From: Fred J. McCall (fmccall_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: OM: "Re: A clearly stated goal"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: A clearly stated goal"
- In reply to: Michael Smith: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Next in thread: Rhonda Lea Kirk: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Reply: Rhonda Lea Kirk: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:03:29 GMT
Michael Smith <smithm@SPAMBLOCKnetapps.com.au> wrote:
:On 12 Feb 2005 11:04:27 -0800
:digicross@hotmail.com wrote:
:
:> Working in a factory (like the ones where many Chinese female workers
:> work), sniping, living in micro-G enviroment and operating things do
:> no require a strong and resistant creature.
:
:But going to mars actually requires somebody physically small and able to live on smaller quantities of oxygen, food, etc.
:
:More women would satisfy this requirement than men, so using Grigoryev's own argument it should be women going to Mars.
Think 'calcium loss'. I think this affects women much more severely
than men.
--
"Rule Number One for Slayers - Don't die."
-- Buffy, the Vampire Slayer
- Next message: OM: "Re: A clearly stated goal"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: A clearly stated goal"
- In reply to: Michael Smith: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Next in thread: Rhonda Lea Kirk: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Reply: Rhonda Lea Kirk: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|