Re: STS51L Accident Questions
From: Chuck Stewart (zapkitty_at_gmx.co.uk)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Chuck Stewart: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Previous message: cgamble_at_worldcom.ch: "Re: FWD: More Flash Madness"
- In reply to: lexcorp_at_ix.netcom.com: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Next in thread: OM: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Reply: OM: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 03:46:32 -0500
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:04:08 -0800, lexcorp wrote:
>> So this is continous?
> Yup. So long as there's aluminum in the propellant, there's slag.
Hmmm... Needs a more efficient oxidizer....
...
C1F5! :)
-- Chuck Stewart "Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"
- Next message: Chuck Stewart: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Previous message: cgamble_at_worldcom.ch: "Re: FWD: More Flash Madness"
- In reply to: lexcorp_at_ix.netcom.com: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Next in thread: OM: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Reply: OM: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
