Re: STS51L Accident Questions
From: Chuck Stewart (zapkitty_at_gmx.co.uk)
Date: 03/10/05
- Next message: David Higgins: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Previous message: Dave Michelson: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- In reply to: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Next in thread: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:32:34 -0500
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:26:42 -0600, Pat Flannery wrote:
> If the thing did stay in place,
Er... no. The hold-down bolts are to keep the stack
on the pad while the crawler transports it etc. They
are _not_ designed to "restrain" the SRB's when
they're lit.
> I assume you shut down the SSMEs and wait till the
> SRBs finish their burn,
By which time, assuming some magic force is holding
the SRB's in place, I'll bet the launch pad melts or
something :)
> Pat
-- Chuck Stewart "Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"
- Next message: David Higgins: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Previous message: Dave Michelson: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- In reply to: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Next in thread: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Reply: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|