Re: STS51L Accident Questions
From: Pat Flannery (flanner_at_daktel.com)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Previous message: lexcorp_at_ix.netcom.com: "BWAAHAHA!!! 51L questions answered..."
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:16:49 -0600
Derek Lyons wrote:
>Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>No, I got you; I was just saying that bigger areas were going to present
>>a much tougher problem than a missing tile or two.
>>
>>
>
>Reality check; at some point you will reach a point where repair is no
>longer feasible, and a Bad Day is a certainty.
>
>
That's why I liked the reentry capsule back in the cargo bay.
With luck, we'll stay lucky till they are retired...but there will be a
major squawk when the planned day of retirement nears, as a lot of money
is tied up in keeping the Shuttle flying, and a lot of government and
corporate entities will be loathe to lose that income.
Pat
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Previous message: lexcorp_at_ix.netcom.com: "BWAAHAHA!!! 51L questions answered..."
- In reply to: Derek Lyons: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|