Re: BWAAHAHA!!! 51L questions answered...
From: Damon Hill (damon1six1_at_comcast.not)
Date: 03/12/05
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: doing it again (was Re: STS51L Accident Questions)"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- In reply to: lexcorp_at_ix.netcom.com: "BWAAHAHA!!! 51L questions answered..."
- Next in thread: Charleston: "Re: BWAAHAHA!!! 51L questions answered..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:23:00 -0600
lexcorp@ix.netcom.com wrote in news:1110579214.314400.52280
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
> But, if you didn't know
> what you were looking at, and didn't know who to ask, and were looking
> for evidence of a coverup anyway... that lack of data could be seen as
> Evidence Of Malfeasance.
The correct answer is usually the boring one. Naturally, the
incompetants will fill in the blanks with their own
paranoid assumptions.
--Damon
- Next message: Pat Flannery: "Re: doing it again (was Re: STS51L Accident Questions)"
- Previous message: OM: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- In reply to: lexcorp_at_ix.netcom.com: "BWAAHAHA!!! 51L questions answered..."
- Next in thread: Charleston: "Re: BWAAHAHA!!! 51L questions answered..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|