OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here.
From: Paul Maxson (pmaxson_at_surewestspam.net)
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Random interesting but important link for OM and Jorge!"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: doing it again (was Re: STS51L Accident Questions)"
- Next in thread: James: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Reply: James: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Maybe reply: Chuck Stewart: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Maybe reply: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Maybe reply: Limey: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:42:19 GMT
http://groups-beta.google.com/advanced_search
Author OM ....... aka (Bob Mosley III , Austin TX, USA)
keyword PLONK
group sci.space.*
http://tinyurl.com/4shkm
As of 3-14-2005 he has 278 pages of allegedly plonking, replonking etc,
278 pages of it!
The message here? His signal to noise ratio is off the charts. He does not
have any self control on Usenet.
Same search, keyword, "cue."
http://tinyurl.com/3sncp 82 pages!
Message? He encourages others to increase the noise ratio higher by "cue___"
like it's a game.
Keyword Maxson, message, he targets people to harass and does not care
about the noise.
You can pick any of several names and go back 10 years with similar
results.
http://tinyurl.com/677y6
623 pages! Not posts, complete pages to links all written by him!
I could refine these searches and use other names and form patterns of
harassment
but it is very clear that the leader of the noise, the one man who ruins the
group is OM.
It is also very clear to me that he will never change, several intelligent
people, friends and
even long time posters have asked him to stop year after year after year.
Many good posters
that others have enjoys have even left. The bottom line? OM aka Bob Mosley
III doesn't
care what anyone here thinks except himself. He is selfish and will never
stop his actions above.
I have decided to just print this out and be the bigger man and simply
leave.
I have tried to assist others, defend myself, explain my jobs and it's
pointless.
When veterans like OM care more about arguing and calling
people and companies liars (and much worse) than the USA troops being
protected
and could care less what the others wishing it would stop on the group think
then OM
is doing the group a disservice. If I want to defend myself against his
slander it will
take the rest of his life. I have to go protect our assets and I do care
what others think.
I am leaving, let Bob trash me and the group. In the end after all is said
and done
I will have attempted to stop his slander, tried to help the noise ratio and
I am now
leaving. If he slanders me it will archive. I have thought about this and
talked to others
and we agree that the better man will simply turn away. I'm turning away,
for good.
Laugh at me while I defend our interests over there OM, I will thank God I
didn't
turn out to be such a bitter rude foul mouthed man like you. I hope you find
help and peace.
Paul Maxson
3-14-2005
- Next message: Derek Lyons: "Re: Random interesting but important link for OM and Jorge!"
- Previous message: Derek Lyons: "Re: doing it again (was Re: STS51L Accident Questions)"
- Next in thread: James: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Reply: James: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Maybe reply: Chuck Stewart: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Maybe reply: Herb Schaltegger: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Maybe reply: Limey: "Re: OM's Usenet History of signal to noise ratio, and my final post here."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|